
The staffing squeeze: Why 2026 budgets can’t be static
Rihan Javid, D.O., J.D., argues that rigid staffing budgets are a liability in 2026 — and explains why planning for raises is cheaper than constant replacement.
Rihan Javid, D.O., J.D., lays out a blunt reality for practice leaders: if your 2026 budget assumes flat labor costs, you are already behind.
He says practices should be looking at three benchmarks when they plan: the statutory minimum wage, the true market wage for their region and a realistic “living wage” for their staff — which, in health care, often converges with market rates. Ignoring those numbers and hoping to hold the line on pay is a fast way to lose people.
Instead, he recommends building in room for raises from the start.
Newsletter
Stay informed and empowered with Medical Economics enewsletter, delivering expert insights, financial strategies, practice management tips and technology trends — tailored for today’s physicians.






