Banner

News

Video

The new standard for medical malpractice: A step toward ending defensive medicine?

Author(s):

Fact checked by:

Daniel Aaron, M.D., J.D., an associate professor of law at the University of Utah, explains how the American Law Institute’s new malpractice standard could ease one of medicine’s biggest sources of stress: fear of being sued.

Will a legal shift reduce unnecessary tests and referrals?

In an interview with Medical Economics, Daniel Aaron, M.D., J.D., associate professor of law at the University of Utah, explains how the American Law Institute’s new malpractice standard could ease one of medicine’s biggest sources of stress: fear of being sued.

“The first thing I just want to say … is that most doctors do not experience even a single penny of financial liability,” Aaron said. “The physician who does have to pay a single penny is exceedingly rare.”

While physicians still report anxiety over legal risk, Aaron said the revised standard could help. “It allows them to practice more in accordance with the evidence, and they don’t need to follow what everybody else does … as a matter of adhering to custom.”

Related Videos
The new standard for medical malpractice: What to watch for
The new standard for medical malpractice: Can doctors be liable for doing what everyone else does?
The new standard for medical malpractice: What makes a clinical guideline legally defensible?
The new standard for medical malpractice: What it means for day-to-day practice
The new standard for medical malpractice: What changed?
The new standard for medical malpractice: Why the law just changed
ACP policy update 2025: A conversation with Brian E. Outland, PhD
ACP policy update 2025 interview