
PCMH model not yet delivering on promise
Analysis of data at one of the nation's largest Patient-centered Medical Home pilots finds limited improvements in costs and patient outcomes.
A new
A team of researchers from the
After examining three years of data-from June 2008 through May 2011-the researchers found improvement in one quality measure-nephropathy screening in
“We were a little surprised by the findings, mainly because expectations of the medical home concept
Mark W. Friedberg, MD, MPPhave been very high,”
The research team also compared data from the PCMH practices with data from 29 similarly sized practices in the region that were not part of the pilot. They found no significant differences between the two groups in any of the areas measured.
Friedberg cautions that the study’s findings shouldn’t be interpreted to mean that the PCMH model can’t work. “It’s really just to say there’s not guarantee that all attempts to implement the model are going to meet the high expectations for it,” he says.
Other studies have shown improvements in outcome and lowered costs in PCMH settings. In July 2013
Diabetic patients treated in the studied PCMHs also saw a 60% improvement in getting their low-density lipoprotein levels under adequate control. Overall, the number of patients with poorly controlled diabetes declined by 45%, according to IBC.
Friedberg notes that research on PCMHs is continuing, both by his team and others. “Once we have results from these (studies) we’ll be able to look at those that performed better and those that performed less well, and deduce in a quantitative way what seems to make a difference,” he says.
Results of the RAND study were published in the February 26, 2014 issue of the
Newsletter
Stay informed and empowered with Medical Economics enewsletter, delivering expert insights, financial strategies, practice management tips and technology trends — tailored for today’s physicians.