
53% of doctors aren't sure medicine is worth it
Key Takeaways
- Survey responses showed only 47% would still pursue medicine under a $200,000 cap; trainees were less willing than practicing physicians to repeat the path.
- Debt repayment led financial priorities (79%), with student loans the dominant burden, often displacing retirement saving, investing, and homebuying while complicating major purchase planning.
Panacea Financial's 2026 customer survey shows the financial strain of medicine doesn't ease with attending salary.
More than half of doctors aren’t sure they would choose medicine again under the federal student loan cap that takes effect this summer, according to a new
In the survey of 269 physicians, dentists and veterinarians, 47% said they would still pursue medicine if they were starting over today under a $200,000 federal professional-degree loan cap. Twenty-seven percent said they would not. Twenty-six percent said they were unsure. The reservations were sharpest among trainees: only 46% of doctors still in school, residency or fellowship said they would make the same choice again, compared with 50% of practicing physicians.
The cap, set to take effect July 1, will
"When more than half of doctors aren't sure the career was worth it, that's not a personal finance problem — it's a systemic one,”
Why does debt define doctors’ financial lives?
Paying off debt was the single most common financial priority across the survey, named by 79% of respondents. It outranked retirement savings (38%), investing for the future (41%) and homebuying (27%). Among respondents actively paying down debt, 88% identified student loans as the primary burden, with credit cards (61%), personal loans (54%) and mortgages (28%) trailing well behind.
The pressure shapes more than balance sheets. Seventy percent of respondents said they struggle to balance loan repayment with other financial goals, and 65% said they are trying to plan for a major purchase while managing debt.
"I like what I do… but I could be so much further ahead financially had I chosen another path," one attending orthopedic surgeon wrote in an open-ended response.
James Dahle, M.D., FACEP, founder of
Does higher attending pay solve the strain?
Not entirely. On a 5-point scale, self-rated financial confidence climbs from 2.33 in medical school to 2.63 in training and 3.27 in practice, but never approaches the top of the scale. Across the full sample, 71% of respondents rated their financial confidence at 3 or below.
Tax and compensation questions persist into practice. Of doctors who reported struggling with tax complexity, 48% were already practicing. For compensation uncertainty, 53% were still in training and 38% were in practice.
"The problem is, as doctors, we make enough money to be able to make mistakes. And on the outside, it does not look like we're making any mistakes. We still make enough cash flow per month to be able to pay for some of this debt," Jerkins told Medical Economics in late 2025. "But that doesn't allow you to save — which allows you more flexibility, which allows you to be in control of your time."
What gaps in financial education do doctors describe?
Forty-six percent of respondents said they do not fully understand their loan repayment, forgiveness or refinancing options. In open-ended responses, 45% of comments touched on student loans, repayment or refinancing — three times more than any other theme.
Fifteen percent cited a lack of financial education or guidance during training.
"It would have been useful to have more robust financial education during medical school and/or residency. I had to learn everything on my own," one attending endocrinologist wrote.
Bryan Jepson, M.D., CFP, a practicing physician, certified financial planner and host of “
"The most important thing, especially for physicians, is to be intentional and take ownership of your own financial success,"
Jerkins, who trained as an internal medicine and pediatrics physician before co-founding Panacea, has argued that schools and accrediting bodies bear part of the responsibility.
"You're not going to make any changes until an
What does the new federal loan cap mean for the physician pipeline?
For some respondents, the policy raises questions about access to medical careers.
"I came from a poor family and have $500k in loans. I wouldn't have been able to pay for it," one attending family medicine physician wrote.
Another respondent, an internal medicine resident, said: "I accepted the debt burden because I knew I had repayment options (Income-Based Repayment (IBR), Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF), etc.). If forced to take out 6 figures of private student loans, that would be a significant barrier."
Whether the cap will reshape the physician pipeline is an open question. PSLF itself remains in place, but borrowers taking out new federal student loans on or after July 1, 2026, will face a narrower set of repayment options.
The Saving on a Valuable Education (SAVE) plan ended in March after a
For borrowers with new loans made on or after July 1, 2026, RAP — the Repayment Assistance Plan — will be the income-driven option, alongside the new standard repayment plan. For many borrowers, RAP is expected to produce higher payments than SAVE, though the impact will vary by income, dependents and loan balance.
Dahle noted that medical school debt has hovered around $200,000 for several years, a figure that closely tracks the new federal cap.
With Grad PLUS eliminated for new graduate and professional borrowers and Direct Unsubsidized Loans capped at $50,000 per year and $200,000 in aggregate for professional students, minus prior graduate borrowing, students whose costs exceed the cap may need private loans or other nonfederal financing. Private loans are not eligible for PSLF or federal income-driven repayment.
The survey was conducted among 269
Newsletter
Stay informed and empowered with Medical Economics enewsletter, delivering expert insights, financial strategies, practice management tips and technology trends — tailored for today’s physicians.






