• Revenue Cycle Management
  • COVID-19
  • Reimbursement
  • Diabetes Awareness Month
  • Risk Management
  • Patient Retention
  • Staffing
  • Medical Economics® 100th Anniversary
  • Coding and documentation
  • Business of Endocrinology
  • Telehealth
  • Physicians Financial News
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cardiovascular Clinical Consult
  • Locum Tenens, brought to you by LocumLife®
  • Weight Management
  • Business of Women's Health
  • Practice Efficiency
  • Finance and Wealth
  • EHRs
  • Remote Patient Monitoring
  • Sponsored Webinars
  • Medical Technology
  • Billing and collections
  • Acute Pain Management
  • Exclusive Content
  • Value-based Care
  • Business of Pediatrics
  • Concierge Medicine 2.0 by Castle Connolly Private Health Partners
  • Practice Growth
  • Concierge Medicine
  • Business of Cardiology
  • Implementing the Topcon Ocular Telehealth Platform
  • Malpractice
  • Influenza
  • Sexual Health
  • Chronic Conditions
  • Technology
  • Legal and Policy
  • Money
  • Opinion
  • Vaccines
  • Practice Management
  • Patient Relations
  • Careers

Working with patients to manage diabetes

Medical Economics JournalJune 25 2019 edition
Volume 96
Issue 12

Primary care physicians, working in an environment where patients need to be evaluated, monitored, and motivated in short office visits, sometimes struggle to effectively treat patients with diabetes.

Doctors often struggle with diabetes management

Primary care physicians, working in an environment where patients need to be evaluated, monitored, and motivated in short office visits, sometimes struggle to effectively treat patients with diabetes. Almost half of patients with diabetes don’t meet their related goals, including A1C blood glucose levels, blood pressure, and LDL cholesterol levels, according to a study in the New England Journal of Medicine. That’s a problem in the U.S., where more than 30 million people are diagnosed with diabetes, accounting for $237 billion a year in medical costs.

The healthcare ecosystem is shifting to value-based medicine, notably through Medicare’s Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS). That program rewards or punishes physicians financially, depending in part on their ability to meet quality metrics, including for patients with diabetes. Physicians are being measured on how they manage their patients’ A1C, blood pressure, LDL cholesterol, smoking cessation and more.

“In the days of meaningful use, there were only rewards,” says Ashok Balasubramanyam, MD, an endocrinologist and professor of medicine in the Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism at Baylor College of Medicine, Houston. “Now we’re in phase of reward and punishment if not met.”

How can doctors motivate their patients to adhere to treatment plans while meeting national quality metrics and maximizing reimbursement for diabetes care?

Giving patients responsibility

Given all the metrics to track, such as A1C, the healthcare system has made diabetes mostly about the numbers, says Randall Stafford, MD, Ph.D., an internist and director of the Program on Prevention Outcomes and Practices at Stanford Preventive Research Center, Palo Alto, Calif. By doing that, it’s removed the patient’s ability to feel they’re contributing to their disease management. “If we continue to push for more attention on the numbers, it could backfire,” he says.

One way Stafford motivates his patients is having them correlate how they’re feeling with what they’re doing with their own care, including diet, exercise, and blood sugar management. “It seems like common sense, but we’ve lost track of that to some degree,” he says. “We drastically undersell behavior as a strategy in diabetes.” Behaviors are important links to what people can do to better manage their diabetes, he says.

Stafford avoids using the word exercise with is patients, instead calling it physical activity. “Many people view exercise as something that needs to be difficult and exhausting,” he says. He defines physical activity as something that can be social, like dancing or walking with a spouse. He encourages patients to increase their activity level for a few weeks, and most will realize they feel better. “If the physical activity can reinforce that correlation with how they feel, that leads to better engagement and better self-management.”

Marc Price, DO, once used scare tactics with his patients, telling them stories of fictional characters, with downfalls that happened when they didn’t take care of their A1C levels. “That didn’t seem to work,” says Price, a family practitioner in Malta, N.Y. Now he uses motivational interviewing, asking patients questions to find out what internal motivators might encourage them to take better care of their diabetes. A patient’s motivation might be improving mobility, so they can play more actively with their grandchildren, for example.

Price also finds it helpful to listen to patients’ struggles, as some share that they can’t afford to pay for medication and also their living expenses. He’ll work with them to find less expensive medications, if possible, and his office provides information on finding cheaper diabetes supplies like testing strips.

He also explains to patients why they should be taking certain actions, even when they feel well. He may tell them to take their statin even if their cholesterol is normal, as diabetes causes life-long changes in various parts of the body.

Lifestyle changes are the hardest for patients to make, so he encourages small changes. “We ask patients to lose 1 pound, not 50, and then we give a lot of feedback,” he says. He tells patients that even a small weight change will help their blood pressure glycemic control, and he tells them that weight change is mostly a result of dietary adjustment.

What can primary care ­doctors do differently?

It takes time to finding out what issues patients experience while managing their diabetes, and this is further complicated by how short the typical office visit is. Time is the biggest factor in gaining patient trust so they’ll share this information, Balasubramanyam says. Meeting guideline-based metrics and checking them off in the EHR makes it harder to develop that patient relationship, as there’s less time spent in face-to-face conversation and more time spent looking at the EHR while asking questions. During visits with his patients who have diabetes, he asks a lot of questions about neuropathic complications, sexual dysfunction, depression, mood issues, and adherence. “I can’t think of any way other than making time and asking the questions,” he says.

Even though it takes time away from the patient/physician discussion during the visit, the low-hanging fruit in improving care is measuring and recording the needed metrics. This is something a physician should be doing at every visit, and can be easily incorporated in the EHR, Balasubramanyam says. “That’s been shown to make a difference,” he says.

The harder part of treatment is personalizing the treatment. “Diabetes isn’t one thing,” he says, and selecting what treatments to recommend for each patient is something many endocrinologists strive to do but aren’t necessarily doing. “If you treat everybody the same, you get a mixed bag of results that won’t make a difference,” he says.

Instead, he recommends risk stratification measures, using clinical analytical tools. For each measure, like controlling sugar or blood pressure, there are subgroups with evidence for each. To get to that level of sophistication with treatment, he recommends education. The American Diabetes Association sponsors good research, publications, and CME, he says.

The NCQA metrics set minimum standards for diabetes screenings, Balasubramanyam says. That includes eye and foot exams every year.

In Price’s practice, the office staff ensures the patient is set up with an eye exam every year, and the medical assistant periodically checks the charts to make sure the patients kept the eye appointment. If not, the chart is annotated and Price follows up with them at the next primary care visit. Patients with diabetes routinely get their urine and thyroid checked yearly, and Price looks for the results when they come in. He recommends that his patients with well-controlled diabetes come for office visits at least twice a year, once for a physical, and once for a six-month check. If their diabetes is not well-controlled, he’ll ask them to come every three months, and if poorly controlled, every two to four weeks to check their sugars and adjust their medication.

Using a team-based approach

Using a team approach to diabetes care, the staff can spread the tasks out, Stafford says. “The physician may be in position of authority and seen as the captain of the team, but I don’t think the physician needs to do all the tasks.”

With limited time for office visits, using a team-based approach can provide additional patient education and care, boosting reimbursement as well. “If the goal is an A1C below a certain threshold, it doesn’t matter if the physician, dietician, or community health worker is part of that process,” Stafford says. A team-based approach allows the patient to get more attention to the social and psychological dimensions important to some with diabetes.

Endocrinology centers may be better equipped with healthcare extenders, but small offices can bring in specialists as well. Price has a diabetes educator/nutritionist come to the office once a month. Insurance is billed for these visits, as many of the patients have benefits that cover it. For those with no insurance benefits, Price’s office covers the cost.

The Oak Forest, Ill., county clinic, Oak Forest Health Center, uses a team-based approach to diabetes care. Almost 25 percent of their patients are diagnosed with type 2 diabetes.  The team schedules lab tests before visits, calls patients with pending lab orders, preps the upcoming patient charts with A1C values, and conducts a daily huddle to share expectations and information before the day’s visits. Patients complete self-directed goal sheets at each visit, discussing them with the physician, who logs and monitors goals over time. Newly diagnosed patients and those with A1C levels at nine or above, are referred for diabetes education and care management. The program has been successful in better controlling patients’ diabetes.

Though primary care physicians may be tempted to refer out difficult diabetes cases, Stafford says that primary care physicians should be able to care for patients with relatively complex care, including those on insulin and oral medications. “The primary care approach really is superior, particularly in the ability to see the whole person and all medical issues,” he says. “In my own experience in referring to endocrine, they do a great job in diabetes, but not necessarily treating the totality of a patient’s medical issues.”

Related Videos
Victor J. Dzau, MD, gives expert advice
Victor J. Dzau, MD, gives expert advice
Monica Verduzco-Gutierrez, MD, FAAPMR, gives expert advice
Monica Verduzco-Gutierrez, MD, FAAPMR, gives expert advice
Monica Verduzco-Gutierrez, MD, FAAPMR, gives expert advice
Monica Verduzco-Gutierrez, MD, FAAPMR, gives expert advice