Intensive glycemic control not associated with more falls or fractures in older patients
Older adults with type 2 diabetes who follow intensive glycemic control practices are not at increased risk for falls or fractures compared with patients who follow standard glycemic control, despite a higher incidence of hypoglycemia in the former, reported investigators who analyzed data from the ACCORD BONE study.
Older  adults with type 2 diabetes who follow intensive glycemic control practices are  not at increased risk for falls or fractures compared with patients who follow standard glycemic control, despite a  higher incidence of hypoglycemia in the former, reported investigators who  analyzed data from the ACCORD BONE study.
      “We didn't see  a net effect of intensive therapy on either fractures or falls,” said Ann V  Schwartz, PhD, Associate Professor of Epidemiology at the University of  California, San Francisco, in an interview.
      She and her colleagues looked at data on patients followed in the ACCORD trial who reported  falls or fractures in the previous year during at least 1 follow-up visit. 
      The ACCORD  trial was a double 2 x 2 factorial, parallel treatment trial in which  participants were randomly assigned to either intensive or standard glycemic  control. Two additional subtrials looked at the effects of intensive versus  standard therapy to control lipids and blood pressure.
      ACCORD BONE  was an ancillary study involving 7287 participants in the fracture substudy and  6782 in the falls substudy.
      The frequency  of falls did not differ between the groups, and there was no increase in  fall risk among participants aged 65 years or older using intensive control.  There were also no differences by sex.
      In the  fractures analysis, the authors compared first nonpathologic fractures  excluding fractures of the lumbar or thoracic spine.
      The investigators found that there was no effect of intensive glycemic control on  fracture risk (hazard ratio 1.04, 95% confidence interval 0.85–1.27) and no  differences when specific fracture sites (ie, hip, humerus, distal forearm,  ankle or foot) were examined separately. There was also no difference in  fracture risk among patients aged 65 years or older.
      Although  intensive control was associated in ACCORD with an increased frequency of  hypoglycemic episodes requiring assistance, this was not reflected in either  the falls or the fractures substudies.
      “The intensive  glycemia group also experienced a lower risk of specific microvascular  complications, including progression to albuminuria, poor visual acuity, and  lack of light touch discrimination. These complications are associated with  fracture in broader populations, but we did not observe a lower risk of  fracture in the intensive group,” the authors wrote.
      Schwartz noted  that the participants in the ACCORD BONE cohorts had a median age of about 62  years; results might be different among adults age 75 or older, she said.
Newsletter
Stay informed and empowered with Medical Economics enewsletter, delivering expert insights, financial strategies, practice management tips and technology trends — tailored for today’s physicians.















