• Revenue Cycle Management
  • COVID-19
  • Reimbursement
  • Diabetes Awareness Month
  • Risk Management
  • Patient Retention
  • Staffing
  • Medical Economics® 100th Anniversary
  • Coding and documentation
  • Business of Endocrinology
  • Telehealth
  • Physicians Financial News
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cardiovascular Clinical Consult
  • Locum Tenens, brought to you by LocumLife®
  • Weight Management
  • Business of Women's Health
  • Practice Efficiency
  • Finance and Wealth
  • EHRs
  • Remote Patient Monitoring
  • Sponsored Webinars
  • Medical Technology
  • Billing and collections
  • Acute Pain Management
  • Exclusive Content
  • Value-based Care
  • Business of Pediatrics
  • Concierge Medicine 2.0 by Castle Connolly Private Health Partners
  • Practice Growth
  • Concierge Medicine
  • Business of Cardiology
  • Implementing the Topcon Ocular Telehealth Platform
  • Malpractice
  • Influenza
  • Sexual Health
  • Chronic Conditions
  • Technology
  • Legal and Policy
  • Money
  • Opinion
  • Vaccines
  • Practice Management
  • Patient Relations
  • Careers

Hospital Quality Reporting Program Had Little Impact on Death Rates


A new study questions the utility of Hospital Compare in prompting hospitals to improve quality of care.

This article published with permission from The Burrill Report.

Public report cards on hospital quality had no impact on reducing death rates for two key health conditions, according to a recent study of Medicare’s Hospital Compare program. What’s more, patients didn’t use them to find higher quality hospitals.

Hospital Compare is a consumer-oriented website that provides information on how well hospitals provide recommended care to their patients. The program allows consumers to look for a hospital that meets or exceeds expectations when it comes to quality of care.

Health Affairs

Authors of the study, which appears in the March issue of the journal , write that while public reporting of quality measures has been widely implemented in health care to increase transparency and accountability, spur quality improvements and steer patients toward high-quality providers, the program has had a minimal impact on patient mortality. The report cards are under-used by patients and often ignored by referring physicians, authors of the study write.

“The jury's still out on Medicare's effort to improve hospital quality of care by posting death rates and other metrics on a public website,” says lead author Andrew Ryan, an assistant professor of public health at the Weill Cornell Medical College. “Additional studies must prove that public reporting does in fact push hospitals to raise the quality of care standard.”

The study’s authors suggest that future research should examine how the Hospital Compare program could be better structured to encourage improved patient outcomes and the use of high-quality hospitals.

Copyright 2012 Burrill & Company. For more life sciences news and information, visit http://www.burrillreport.com.

Ryan and colleagues from the University of Michigan Medical School sought to clarify whether reporting improvements have reduced risk-adjusted mortality. They found that there was little or no impact in reducing mortality rates within hospitals beyond existing trends for heart attack and pneumonia, though there was a modest impact on reducing deaths from heart failure.

Related Videos
Victor J. Dzau, MD, gives expert advice
Victor J. Dzau, MD, gives expert advice