• Revenue Cycle Management
  • COVID-19
  • Reimbursement
  • Diabetes Awareness Month
  • Risk Management
  • Patient Retention
  • Staffing
  • Medical Economics® 100th Anniversary
  • Coding and documentation
  • Business of Endocrinology
  • Telehealth
  • Physicians Financial News
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cardiovascular Clinical Consult
  • Locum Tenens, brought to you by LocumLife®
  • Weight Management
  • Business of Women's Health
  • Practice Efficiency
  • Finance and Wealth
  • EHRs
  • Remote Patient Monitoring
  • Sponsored Webinars
  • Medical Technology
  • Billing and collections
  • Acute Pain Management
  • Exclusive Content
  • Value-based Care
  • Business of Pediatrics
  • Concierge Medicine 2.0 by Castle Connolly Private Health Partners
  • Practice Growth
  • Concierge Medicine
  • Business of Cardiology
  • Implementing the Topcon Ocular Telehealth Platform
  • Malpractice
  • Influenza
  • Sexual Health
  • Chronic Conditions
  • Technology
  • Legal and Policy
  • Money
  • Opinion
  • Vaccines
  • Practice Management
  • Patient Relations
  • Careers

ACA Subsidies Ruling to Be Reconsidered

Article

The earlier ruling from a 3-person DC appeals court that invalidated healthcare subsidies for people purchasing plans on federally run marketplaces will be reconsidered by the full circuit court.

The earlier ruling from a 3-person DC appeals court that invalidated healthcare subsidies for people purchasing plans on federally run marketplaces will be reconsidered by the full circuit court.

The original decision posed a potential setback for the Affordable Care Act as the judges determined that subsidies could only be provided to residents in states that set up their own health insurance marketplaces. As such, the millions of Americans living in states using federally run marketplaces would not be eligible for subsidies.

However, just hours after the DC ruling, a Virginia court upheld the legality of subsidies in every state — regardless of whether the exchanges were federally or state-run — in a separate, but similar case.

After the July 22 ruling, the US Department of Justice asked the entire court to review the decision. Now the case will be heard by the court’s 11 active judges. When the 3-judge panel delivered the ruling in July, the 2 Republican appointees were in the majority. On the full panel, the Democrats have the majority, 7-4.

Oral arguments will begin on Dec. 17.

Related Videos
Victor J. Dzau, MD, gives expert advice
Victor J. Dzau, MD, gives expert advice