
Survey: Are AI scribes living up to the hype?
Key Takeaways
- AI scribes are being positioned as a pragmatic remedy for documentation overload, promising reduced “pajama-time” charting and improved in-room clinician–patient interaction.
- The decisive question is operational impact: whether AI scribing saves meaningful time or becomes another workflow layer within an already complex health IT stack.
How are AI scribes are really affecting your documentation time, after-hours EHR work, patient interactions and practice finances?
Artificial intelligence (AI) scribes have gone from buzzword to line item in practice budgets. Vendors promise fewer pajama-time notes, more eye contact with patients and a cleaner bottom line. But for physicians on the front lines, the real question is simpler: Are these tools actually saving time and improving visits, or just adding one more layer to an already crowded tech stack?
Medical Economics wants to understand what AI scribes are doing inside real practices. Who is using them? How much documentation time do they actually save? How do they affect after-hours EHR work? Is the investment is paying off?
Please take a moment to anonymously share your experience in the window below, or





