Benjamin P. Saylor

Jeffrey K. Pearson, DO, keeps it simple when discussing risk with his patients. 

"I use a lot of analogies," says the family physician in San Marcos, California. "I will liken things to crossing the street, which can be dangerous, but you can take steps to make it less dangerous, like looking both ways. 

"I think they need to understand it on a personal level and a practical level. Numbers, I think, are kind of lost on them," he says. 

 Unfortunately, even with your best efforts and intentions, a chance exists that patients will misunderstand or dismiss what you tell them. Only by understanding the difficulties you and your patients face in communicating and comprehending risk can you get better at it. 

To improve risk communication, ask yourself whether you're explaining risk in absolute or relative terms. 

What's the difference? Let's say that a new drug reduces the odds of death from cancer from 20 in 1,000 people to 10 in 1,000. Expressing the difference in absolute terms, the risk goes from 2 percent to 1 percent, a change of 1 percent. 

A relative risk expression of this same information would be that the risk of death from cancer has decreased by 50 percent (a drop from 2 percent to 1 percent is, in fact, a 50 percent drop). The relative figure, although technically accurate, makes the decrease in risk of death from cancer seem much more impressive than it really is. 

Express risk in absolute terms to give patients the most complete picture.  

Communicating risk accurately can be difficult, particularly when patients' emotions enter the equation, as John Paling, PhD, discusses in his book, "Helping Patients Understand Risks." Emotions play a critical role in patients' decisions regarding their care, regardless of their level of education, Paling writes. 

Unfortunately, these emotions can lead patients to fixate on the "wrong" risks; people fear unfamiliar risks, although familiar ones actually may pose a greater danger, as written by Paling and David Ropeik and George Gray, authors of "Risk: A Practical Guide for Deciding What's Really Safe and What's Really Dangerous in the World Around You." (Think of the misplaced fears one may have regarding genetically modified foods compared with the bona fide risk of consuming junk food.) 

"Patients often worry about everything - both the things they can and cannot control," says Robert Duhaney, MD, a general internist in Dallas.  

The source of risk information and how much the patient trusts that source are crucial. A British study published in the compilation, "Risk Communication and Public Health," found that the two most trusted sources of risk information are friends and family. 

 Paling also points out that the glut of information available from the Internet and other sources can create doubt in the mind of a patient that you really have all the facts about a particular risk. It also can cause a patient to have an exaggerated perception of the risks or benefits of a medication or procedure. 

The education level of a patient is another factor. More than 20 percent of Americans are considered at or below the lowest level of literacy and numeracy, according to a 1998 report from the National Institute for Literacy. 

Daniel Reimer, MD, a diagnostic radiologist in Mobile, Alabama, says that including a family member or friend of the patient when explaining a test or procedure can increase the odds of comprehension, and Pearson says he tries to speak to his patients at approximately a "grade school level."

Articles

Jeffrey K. Pearson, DO, keeps it simple when discussing risk with his patients.

How to communicate risk to patients

Dementia affects about 4 million to 5 million people in the United States. It affects about one percent of people aged 60 to 64 years and as many as 30 percent to 50 percent of those aged more than 85 years. Dementia is a cause of significant morbidity and mortality and is a leading cause of institutionalization. It places a substantial burden on patients and their caregivers. 

Patients with dementia present a significant diagnostic and treatment challenge to primary care physicians. The leading types of irreversible dementia: 

This month's Clinical Centers of Excellence series features facilities offering comprehensive diagnostic modalities and state-of-the-art treatment modalities including investigational protocols for dementia. The centers also use behavioral interventions and support care. 

The dementia centers were chosen based on a survey of neurologists. Each center was asked to provide patient statistics, research protocol information, and other pertinent dementia management features. We do not rank the centers relative to each other but highlight what makes each one unique. We could not profile them all but have included a list of the other Clinical Centers of Excellence identified by our survey (see the accompanying list). 

 editors also have gathered management and referral tips from the experts associated with the featured centers. These tips may be useful when managing patients with seizure disorders in the primary care setting. 

This month's Clinical Centers of Excellence series features facilities offering comprehensive diagnostic modalities and treatments including investigational protocols for dementia.

Author | Benjamin P. Saylor

Articles

How to communicate risk to patients

Clinical Centers of Excellence: Diagnosis, treatment of dementia