MEC Practice Academy 11.19
News|Videos|September 2, 2026

Do you struggle with difficult patient conversations?

Fact checked by: Todd Shryock, AC Baltz

When you break bad news to patients, do you do it in a way that makes things worse?

Breaking bad news is one of the most difficult tasks physicians face, requiring a delicate balance of honesty, empathy and clinical judgment. Doctors must convey serious diagnoses, prognoses or treatment failures in ways that are truthful yet compassionate, often with little formal training to guide them.

Communication skills can be a major hurdle. Medical training has historically emphasized diagnosis and treatment over interpersonal communication, leaving many doctors underprepared to navigate emotionally charged discussions. Finding the right words, reading a patient's readiness to hear difficult information and adjusting delivery based on cultural or personal factors all require nuanced skill.

Time constraints add further pressure. Busy clinical schedules often don't allow for the unhurried, private conversations that bad news deserves, forcing physicians to balance thoroughness with practical limitations.

Additionally, physicians must manage uncertainty, especially when prognoses are unclear, while avoiding both false hope and undue pessimism. They also face the challenge of supporting patients' decision-making without imposing their own views.

Ultimately, these conversations require ongoing skill development, institutional support, and self-care strategies to help physicians deliver difficult news effectively while protecting their own well-being. Physicians frequently absorb the shock, grief or anger of patients and families while needing to remain composed enough to answer questions and outline next steps. Repeated exposure to these conversations can contribute to burnout and compassion fatigue over time.

In this episode of Conversations that Matter, Dr. Anthony Orsini gives an overview of why physicians struggle with these discussions and lists strategies that will be presented in future episodes.


Related to this article

Sethu Reddy: ©Sethu Reddy
Prior authorization, step therapy and shifting coverage rules keep patients from obesity drugs with proven benefits, an endocrinologist argues — and the long-term savings make the case for broader access.
Is more health care access always better?: ©Yodiyim - stock.adobe.com
In 590,282 California heart attack hospitalizations, a new PCI-capable facility within a 30-minute drive lowered 30-day mortality 20% in communities without prior access but did not change survival where the procedure was already available.