• Revenue Cycle Management
  • COVID-19
  • Reimbursement
  • Diabetes Awareness Month
  • Risk Management
  • Patient Retention
  • Staffing
  • Medical Economics® 100th Anniversary
  • Coding and documentation
  • Business of Endocrinology
  • Telehealth
  • Physicians Financial News
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cardiovascular Clinical Consult
  • Locum Tenens, brought to you by LocumLife®
  • Weight Management
  • Business of Women's Health
  • Practice Efficiency
  • Finance and Wealth
  • EHRs
  • Remote Patient Monitoring
  • Sponsored Webinars
  • Medical Technology
  • Billing and collections
  • Acute Pain Management
  • Exclusive Content
  • Value-based Care
  • Business of Pediatrics
  • Concierge Medicine 2.0 by Castle Connolly Private Health Partners
  • Practice Growth
  • Concierge Medicine
  • Business of Cardiology
  • Implementing the Topcon Ocular Telehealth Platform
  • Malpractice
  • Influenza
  • Sexual Health
  • Chronic Conditions
  • Technology
  • Legal and Policy
  • Money
  • Opinion
  • Vaccines
  • Practice Management
  • Patient Relations
  • Careers

Remote teams: Are they right for you and your practice?

Medical Economics JournalMedical Economics September 2023
Volume 100
Issue 9

Here’s what you need to know about incorporating a work-from-home model.

Over the past few years, medical practices have been forced to make many workplace adjustments to ensure operations ran smoothly and employees were safe and separated during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, as time goes on, some medical practices are discovering that employees are reluctant to come back to the office on a full-time basis. They are not alone. The latest data found that 98% of employees want to work remotely some of the time, and approximately 22% of the American workforce will be remote by 2025.

Working from home: ©Surassawadee -

Working from home: ©Surassawadee -

What does this mean for practices that are facing staffing shortages and increasing expenses? There’s never been a better time to shift the traditional practice paradigm to boost employee satisfaction, offer flexibility and ultimately attract and retain higher-skilled staff members. Here’s what you need to know about incorporating a work-from-home (WFH) model.

Why are practices pivoting?

Prior to the pandemic, remote working arrangements for medical group professionals were few and far between. Practice leaders widely believed that employees needed to be together, in person, to be connected and create a productive workplace culture. There were also logistical issues (e.g., computers and office supplies) and technical concerns (e.g., Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act compliance, secure network) that made it challenging for employees to do their jobs off-site.

Then came the rapid advancement of cloud-based services and software in health care. These solutions have changed the game for practices and made it possible for more employees to do their job from anywhere.

Today, more than 52% of medical practices report that up to a quarter of their workforce is remote, which is a significant increase from the 37% reported in a similar poll from April 2021. Additionally, practices are proactively addressing the on-site/off-site issue by establishing and adhering to workforce policies that can be communicated to employees so they know what to expect.

Will a WFH model work?

Before a WFH model can be implemented, it’s crucial for practices to review and assess operations with practice managers, human resources and technical support. Conduct an open-minded assessment of all workflows and staff roles to determine which tasks and positions can be done efficiently and securely off-site. Communicate with staff to get their opinions and work together to address concerns.

In some cases, it may be easier to shift non-patient-facing positions, such as information technology, accounts payable, scheduling, authorizations and medical records, to a remote model. However, there are also practices conducting patient-facing tasks virtually (similar to an airline check-in or self-checkout at the grocery store) and reducing administrative burdens and costs at the same time.

The last and maybe the most important consideration revolves around leadership. For a WFH or hybrid initiative to be truly embraced, practice leaders must go all in and be involved throughout the process. They must stop relying on people management and start focusing on process management. Managers need to become “connection specialists” and make an effort to stay connected to teams, listen more and trust them to do their jobs.

If the lines of communication are not open and trust is not paramount, a WFH or hybrid approach will most likely not be successful in the practice.

Why consider a WFH model?

From job satisfaction to flexibility to broadening the pool of job candidates and skilled staff members, WFH models open doors of opportunity for employees and practices alike.

For smaller practices, WFH and hybrid arrangements enable them to fill part-time or hourly roles and seek out candidates for specific needs. Larger practices can leverage time savings and the costs associated with reduced office square footage for other expenses. Practices of all sizes can benefit from flexible work hours for the right positions.

The future of health care looks different from the past. The workforce of the present and future have made it known that flexibility is a must. Health care leaders must be willing to let go of the old health care office model and embrace the future opportunities that technology can unlock for practices.

Karrie Barbour, FACMPE, has been in leadership roles in the medical field for more than 25 years. She obtained her Fellowship from the American College of Medical Practice Executives in 2015. She has had the unique opportunity to manage more than 20 different subspecialties during her career.

Related Videos
Jennifer N. Lee, MD, FAAFP
© National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
© National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
© National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
© National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
© National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
© National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health