• Revenue Cycle Management
  • COVID-19
  • Reimbursement
  • Diabetes Awareness Month
  • Risk Management
  • Patient Retention
  • Staffing
  • Medical Economics® 100th Anniversary
  • Coding and documentation
  • Business of Endocrinology
  • Telehealth
  • Physicians Financial News
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cardiovascular Clinical Consult
  • Locum Tenens, brought to you by LocumLife®
  • Weight Management
  • Business of Women's Health
  • Practice Efficiency
  • Finance and Wealth
  • EHRs
  • Remote Patient Monitoring
  • Sponsored Webinars
  • Medical Technology
  • Billing and collections
  • Acute Pain Management
  • Exclusive Content
  • Value-based Care
  • Business of Pediatrics
  • Concierge Medicine 2.0 by Castle Connolly Private Health Partners
  • Practice Growth
  • Concierge Medicine
  • Business of Cardiology
  • Implementing the Topcon Ocular Telehealth Platform
  • Malpractice
  • Influenza
  • Sexual Health
  • Chronic Conditions
  • Technology
  • Legal and Policy
  • Money
  • Opinion
  • Vaccines
  • Practice Management
  • Patient Relations
  • Careers

Online Tools

Article

Is your practice in the red?

Is your practice in the red?

You’ll be able to find out with the Medical Group Management Association’s new online tool, designed to help practices gauge their costs and physician compensation compared to national averages. (You can check it out here: www.mgmadashboards.com.)

To calculate how their practice costs compare, practice managers can enter their accounts receivable, medical revenue, support staff, and operating costs per physician. For compensation, the manager inputs figures on collections, gross charges, ambulatory encounters, surgery/anesthesia cases, and work RVUs.

Like a traffic light, the dashboards use red, yellow, and green visual scores based on your data. Red indicates your costs and compensation are below average for your specialty (i.e., you’re spending too much or not taking in enough for your production levels), yellow means costs are average, and green means spending and compensation are better than the average practice. There is also a numerical score of 0 (bad) to 100 (excellent).

Other than the financial numbers, the tool asks for your type of practice, but does not require other identifiable information.

“Smaller and mid-sized medical groups have been telling us for a long time that they need a quick and easy way to gauge physician and practice performance so that they can better focus their energy toward improvement,” Mick Kasher, MGMA director of survey operations, said in a press release. “We are helping group practices figure out the issues they need to address to survive and prosper in today’s difficult medical economic environment.”

The tool is meant to provide only a “50,000-foot overview” and does not take into account practice size, geography, or other key demographic figures, says David Fein, CEO of ValuSource, the software developer that designed the tool with the MGMA.

“This is not meant as a complete diagnostic tool,” he says. “But there is some statistical validity and accuracy to the data.”

Related Videos
© drsampsondavis.com
© drsampsondavis.com
© drsampsondavis.com
© drsampsondavis.com
© drsampsondavis.com