• Revenue Cycle Management
  • COVID-19
  • Reimbursement
  • Diabetes Awareness Month
  • Risk Management
  • Patient Retention
  • Staffing
  • Medical Economics® 100th Anniversary
  • Coding and documentation
  • Business of Endocrinology
  • Telehealth
  • Physicians Financial News
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cardiovascular Clinical Consult
  • Locum Tenens, brought to you by LocumLife®
  • Weight Management
  • Business of Women's Health
  • Practice Efficiency
  • Finance and Wealth
  • EHRs
  • Remote Patient Monitoring
  • Sponsored Webinars
  • Medical Technology
  • Billing and collections
  • Acute Pain Management
  • Exclusive Content
  • Value-based Care
  • Business of Pediatrics
  • Concierge Medicine 2.0 by Castle Connolly Private Health Partners
  • Practice Growth
  • Concierge Medicine
  • Business of Cardiology
  • Implementing the Topcon Ocular Telehealth Platform
  • Malpractice
  • Influenza
  • Sexual Health
  • Chronic Conditions
  • Technology
  • Legal and Policy
  • Money
  • Opinion
  • Vaccines
  • Practice Management
  • Patient Relations
  • Careers

Anticoagulation in AF: More than just a risk score?


At the 2015 AHA Fall Conference, Daniel E. Singer, MD, spoke about the current shortcomings of atrial fibrillation guidelines that use the CHADS-VASc score.

Is assessing the need for anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) more than just a risk score? Yes, according to Daniel E. Singer, MD, professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School, during a talk delivered at the American Heart Association (AHA) meeting.

Singer spoke on the shortcomings of current AF anticoagulation guidelines that use the CHADS-VASc score to guide anticoagulation decisions saying that these guidelines assume a given CHADS-VASc risk score corresponds to a specific stroke risk while a patient is not taking anticoagulants.

However, he said that the real ischemic stroke risk faced by patients is uncertain given the varied data reported in the literature.

Related:Treating atrial fibrillation: Patient management tips and other considerations

“The fact is that numerous large cohort studies have reported stroke risks for AF patients with given CHADS-VASc point scores and these stroke risks vary 2-4 fold,” he said, pointing out too that these CHADS-VASc point scores are not based on a statistically rigorous model.

Rather than rely on CHADS-VASc point scores to determine anticoagulation need, he emphasized the need to determine if the expected net clinical benefit of anticoagulants will be positive.

“We need to know an AF patient’s risk of ischemic stroke off anticoagulants to determine if the reduction in stroke risk on anticoagulants will be worth the risk of bleeding,” said Singer.

For clinicians who chose to use CHADS-VASc, he urged them to recognize that a score of 1 is heterogenous. He cited the comparison between two patients, each with a CHADS-VASc score of 1. One patient received the score based on a weak risk factor, such as having hypertension, diabetes, being female or having vascular disease. The second patient had the same score based on a strong risk factor: age.

“An AF patient with a CHADS-VASc score of 1 from being 70 years old is at much higher risk of stroke than a patient, age 60, with only hypertension,” he said.

Along with considering individual patient variables when determining stroke risk, Singer also stressed the importance of considering the whole patient, including patient preferences and likelihood of treatment adherence, when deciding on anticoagulant use.

Related Videos
Jennifer N. Lee, MD, FAAFP
© National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
© National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
© National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
© National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
© National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health