
AMA, AHA drop their surprise billing lawsuit
Original suit was against the interim rule
The
The original complaint focused on how the federal government implemented the law through the rulemaking process and argued it
As part of the arbitration process between payers and providers, CMS said arbiters should start with the median in-network rate for a specific service and a specific region. In the interim rule, CMS said arbiters should presume this rate is appropriate for out-of-network services, which the AMA and AHA object to, because it essentially sets a price ceiling.
When the final rule was released, that language was removed.
Newsletter
Stay informed and empowered with Medical Economics enewsletter, delivering expert insights, financial strategies, practice management tips and technology trends — tailored for today’s physicians.



















