
Texas Medical Association sues over surprise billing law arbitration provision
The association claims that the new surprise billing law’s arbitration provision overly favors insurers.
The Texas Medical Association (TMA) is suing the federal government over the arbitration provision recently passed surprise billing legislation.
According to
“TMA supports the patient protection intent of the
TMA’s dispute with the Biden administration lies in the final rule, which requires the IDR arbitrator to presume the median contracted rate, or qualifying payment amount (QPA), set by
“Nowhere did Congress specify that the QPA, or any other factor for that matter, should be given primacy over the other enumerated factors,” the association’s initial complaint says, giving insurers an unfair advantage to insurers.
TMA argues that the rule will incentivize health plans to shrink networks and cut physician payment leading physicians to receive reimbursements which don’t reflect the fair market value of their services, the release says.
“We are disappointed the Biden administration ignored congressional intent and essentially set up the arbitration system to operate like a casino, with health insurers playing the role of the house,” Villarreal says in the release. “Everyone knows the house always wins. With the current rule, patients, physicians, and our country lose.”
Newsletter
Stay informed and empowered with Medical Economics enewsletter, delivering expert insights, financial strategies, practice management tips and technology trends — tailored for today’s physicians.