Banner

Article

We need alternatives to malpractice system

A reader notes that alternatives exist to the current adversarial system of settling medical malpractice claims.

The story on reforming the malpractice system (“Tort reform,” August 10, 2013) focused on physicians’ fear about undergoing the stress of a malpractice suit.

Whether a suit is baseless, and whether the physician wins or not, waiting on tenterhooks while attorneys argue over the merits of a suit is an ordeal that causes dread in most physicians.

Malpractice suits often take years to resolve. Worrying over how the outcome will affect their reputations and their livelihoods can force some physicians to quit practice. And who would want to be operated on by a surgeon who is disturbed and distracted because he/she is awaiting the settlement of a suit?

Several alternatives exist to the adversarial system, including early payment, apologizing, workers type of insurance, and health courts. All are humane methods and can be used to reasonably and fairly deal with patients and physicians.

Edward Volpintesta, MD

Bethel, Connecticut

 

Related Videos
The new standard for medical malpractice: A conversation with Daniel G. Aaron, M.D., J.D.
The new standard for medical malpractice: What to watch for
The new standard for medical malpractice: A step toward ending defensive medicine?
The new standard for medical malpractice: Can doctors be liable for doing what everyone else does?
The new standard for medical malpractice: What makes a clinical guideline legally defensible?
The new standard for medical malpractice: What it means for day-to-day practice
The new standard for medical malpractice: What changed?
The new standard for medical malpractice: Why the law just changed
Locum tenens physicians — Lisa Grabl © CHG Healthcare