• Revenue Cycle Management
  • COVID-19
  • Reimbursement
  • Diabetes Awareness Month
  • Risk Management
  • Patient Retention
  • Staffing
  • Medical Economics® 100th Anniversary
  • Coding and documentation
  • Business of Endocrinology
  • Telehealth
  • Physicians Financial News
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cardiovascular Clinical Consult
  • Locum Tenens, brought to you by LocumLife®
  • Weight Management
  • Business of Women's Health
  • Practice Efficiency
  • Finance and Wealth
  • EHRs
  • Remote Patient Monitoring
  • Sponsored Webinars
  • Medical Technology
  • Billing and collections
  • Acute Pain Management
  • Exclusive Content
  • Value-based Care
  • Business of Pediatrics
  • Concierge Medicine 2.0 by Castle Connolly Private Health Partners
  • Practice Growth
  • Concierge Medicine
  • Business of Cardiology
  • Implementing the Topcon Ocular Telehealth Platform
  • Malpractice
  • Influenza
  • Sexual Health
  • Chronic Conditions
  • Technology
  • Legal and Policy
  • Money
  • Opinion
  • Vaccines
  • Practice Management
  • Patient Relations
  • Careers

Viewpoint: Analysis of the free market incentive model


Tighter government control and expanded regulation are likely to occur in the near future, even if fundamental healthcare reform doesn't materialize.

Health insurance companies profit from insurance premiums for healthy patients. Sick patients, on the other hand, have more inherent risk and, therefore, cost more to insure.

Penalizing physicians with countless inane bureaucracies doesn't work (PPOs, HMOs, P4P, etc.) It raises healthcare costs and engenders bad will between insurance companies, physicians and their patients.

My concept for reform is called the "free market incentive model" for healthcare delivery, healthcare insurance and healthy lifestyles.

The solution lies in free-market competition, not government mandates or insurance company coercion. To keep prices down, physicians would compete with each other for patient "business." Hospitals would compete with other hospitals. Labs would compete with labs. Pharmaceutical companies too would compete directly with each other based on price. Insurance companies would also compete across state lines for business.

Patients pay directly for their care. They shop for quality and price, just like consumers do for all other products and services. They are free to choose physicians and services based on their needs, wants and resources, not their insurance provisos.

People are incentivized to promote and maintain their good health, and it thereby becomes a self-fulfilling cycle. Under this model, insurance companies can financially incentivize their insureds by providing discounts for healthy lifestyle habits and "free" coverage for preventive care and exercise facilities.

Patients will keep costs down because they will pay all of their costs for physicians, testing, and generic medications. They will be motivated to stay healthy and save themselves money.

This system works for other types of insurance, including car insurance. People buy gas, change their oil, rotate tires, etc. Car insurance kicks in only for huge accidental losses.

Unmanaged, unfettered and unimpeded competition is the only solution. Fair market value, determined by competition in the marketplace, would be the price people pay for every aspect of their care.

Under the free-market incentive model, all parties involved would benefit and the health of America would improve and thrive.

Craig M. Wax, DO, is a family physician in Mullica Hill, New Jersey. Send your feedback to meletters@advanstar.com

Related Videos
© National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health