Banner
  • Revenue Cycle Management
  • COVID-19
  • Reimbursement
  • Diabetes Awareness Month
  • Risk Management
  • Patient Retention
  • Staffing
  • Medical Economics® 100th Anniversary
  • Coding and documentation
  • Business of Endocrinology
  • Telehealth
  • Physicians Financial News
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cardiovascular Clinical Consult
  • Locum Tenens, brought to you by LocumLife®
  • Weight Management
  • Business of Women's Health
  • Practice Efficiency
  • Finance and Wealth
  • EHRs
  • Remote Patient Monitoring
  • Sponsored Webinars
  • Medical Technology
  • Billing and collections
  • Acute Pain Management
  • Exclusive Content
  • Value-based Care
  • Business of Pediatrics
  • Concierge Medicine 2.0 by Castle Connolly Private Health Partners
  • Practice Growth
  • Concierge Medicine
  • Business of Cardiology
  • Implementing the Topcon Ocular Telehealth Platform
  • Malpractice
  • Influenza
  • Sexual Health
  • Chronic Conditions
  • Technology
  • Legal and Policy
  • Money
  • Opinion
  • Vaccines
  • Practice Management
  • Patient Relations
  • Careers

Vermont considers single-payer system

Article

An advisory team to the Vermont legislature recommends that the state switch to a single-payer system managed by an independent board and claims processor as the best option to cover all of its residents and control costs.

An advisory team to the Vermont legislature recommends that the state switch to a single-payer healthcare system managed by an independent board and claims processor as the best option to cover all of its residents and control costs.

The advisory team, led by William Hsiao, PhD, a professor of economics at the Harvard School of Public Health, was commissioned last year by state lawmakers to analyze three models for state health reform. The options considered were a single-payer model run by the government; a public health plan option; or single-payer public/private hybrid with an independent board and claims processed by a third-party contractor.

"Beyond yielding greater cost savings, we believe Option 3 is most feasible because it is likely to be accepted by the broadest cross-section of Vermont stakeholders," Hsaio wrote to lawmakers.

Related Videos