Article

Two new reports critical of fee-for-service model

The current fee-for-service model used by the U.S. healthcare system is costly and ineffective for physicians and patients, according to two recent reports in influential health-policy journals.

The current fee-for-service model used by the U.S. healthcare system is costly and ineffective for physicians and patients, according to two recent reports in influential health-policy journals.

The January 27 issue of Health Affairs evaluates numerous Medicare physician payment reforms, noting the current fee-for-service model, in which doctors are encouraged to see more patients and order additional tests and procedures to increase revenue, is "short-changing important but less lucrative areas such as primary care."

The study's authors advocate moving to a bundled payment for "episodes of care," which combine hospital, physician, and clinical services into a single rate. The episodes would have defined services, so that care isn't curtailed to increase profit.

Newsletter

Stay informed and empowered with Medical Economics enewsletter, delivering expert insights, financial strategies, practice management tips and technology trends — tailored for today’s physicians.

Related Videos
The new standard for medical malpractice: A conversation with Daniel G. Aaron, M.D., J.D.
The new standard for medical malpractice: What to watch for
The new standard for medical malpractice: A step toward ending defensive medicine?
The new standard for medical malpractice: Can doctors be liable for doing what everyone else does?
The new standard for medical malpractice: What makes a clinical guideline legally defensible?
The new standard for medical malpractice: What it means for day-to-day practice
The new standard for medical malpractice: What changed?
The new standard for medical malpractice: Why the law just changed
ACP policy update 2025: A conversation with Brian E. Outland, PhD
ACP policy update 2025 interview