Nothing is certain but death and taxes, but there are legal strategies to help reduce your overall tax burden. Here are 5 good ones.
Today, we’ll take a look at theTop 5 legal ways to reduce taxable income.
If you, like most physicians, have a high marginal tax rate, you are generally better off deferring as much tax as possible by taking advantage of traditional tax-deferred retirement plans. Employees may have access to a 401(k), 403(b) or 401(a), and perhaps a 457(b). Contractors and the self-employed might use a SEP-IRA, SIMPLE IRA, solo 401(k), or a defined benefit plan.
If you are in a position to have a high deductible health plan, an HSA is another tax deferral/avoidance strategy you should utilize. Individuals can contribute $3,350, families $6,750, with an additional $1000 if ages 55 or up.
Take advantage of these; max ’em out if you can. You’ll lower your tax rate now, and there’s a better-than-decent chance you will find yourself in a lower tax bracket when you withdraw the money, particularly if you are planning toretire early.
In certain instances, you may have the option of making Roth contributions to some of these retirement accounts, foregoing the tax deduction. While some people like to do this, and it could be beneficial under certain circumstances, I’m not a fan. I makeBackdoor Roth contributions for my wife and I, butmy 401(k) and 457(b) contributions are 100% traditional and tax-deferred.
How much can a physician save on the tax bill by maxing out his available tax deferred retirement space? If we look at a single physician with a $300,000 salary, plugging numbers intoTaxCastergives me afederal income tax of $79,665, with the standard deduction and exemptions. If she does what I do, maxing out a 401(k), 457(b), and HSA, she will deduct $18,000 + $18,000 + $3,350 = $39,350, dropping taxable wages from $300,000 to $260,650. Federal IncomeTax drops to $66,247. At a 33% marginal tax rate,she saves $13,418on her tax bill this year.
If she doesn’t live in one of the seven states without a state income tax, she’ll see additional savings on the state bill. With a 5% state tax, she’d save about another $2,000.In a high tax state, the additional savings can exceed $4,000.
The self-employed can takemany deductions, whereas an employee is much more limited. Some physicians have the benefit of being both an employee and an independent contractor. One such physician is Jim Dahle, MD who practices emergency medicine and has an influential personal finance blog, wrote a book, speaks at physician meetings, and canyoneers, and has four kids, and…how does he do it all?!? Do yourself a favor and take a look athis 2016 tax reportif you haven’t already.
There are some downsides to being self-employed too, of course. You are responsible for acquiring your own benefits package, and you will pay both the employer and employee portion of social security and medicare taxes.
I think we all know that giving to charity is a good way to lower the tax bill. Of course, giving to charity doesn’t build wealth, but giving can be done in ways that give the most benefit with the least cost to you. When you give to charity and have a marginal tax rate of 40%, you’re saying “I’d rather give this charity $100 than give $40 to the government.” I make that choice quite often.
Of course, if you don’t itemize deductions, you won’t see any benefit, so the sum of your itemized deductions (which includes charitable giving) must exceed the standard deduction ($6300 for singles, $12,600 for married filing jointly).
Donating assets (stocks, mutual funds, property) directly to a charitable organization, or indirectly via adonor advised fund, has the additional benefit of eliminating capital gains taxes. You don’t pay them, the charity doesn’t pay them. They just disappear, much like my boys when it’s time to brush teeth.
A lonely toothbrush
Also, don’t be put off by thePease provision, which made headlines because it is labeled as a cap on itemized deductions. The rule shouldn’t discourage you from charitable giving; you still get the same deduction for each additional dollar given to charity. It is really just a surtax on high income individuals. If you’ve never heard of the Pease provision, I wouldn’t worry much about it. For further reading, look at thisnice summaryby Alan Viard.
It’s true that combining two incomes can lead to a “marriage penalty“, a situation that arises when the total tax bill of a married couple exceeds the sum of the tax bills they would have paid if they had filed separately. However, when most or all of the income is earned by one partner, adding a spouse lowers your total tax.
Visiting TaxCaster again, we’ll compare a single man with a $300,000 salary with his contemporary, who has the same salary and supports a wife and four kids.
If these doctors haven’t read my first way to reduce taxes and don’t max out their available tax-deferred space, the single doc owes $79,665 in taxes while the Married with Children doc owes $66,424,a savings of $13,241.Love pays.
Like the last two ways to reduce your tax bill, this one isn’t going to make you any richer, but working and earning less will certainly reduce your tax bill substantially. As we learned whenDr. A chose to work part time, her salary was cut in half, but her federal income tax dropped by more than 80%! One more visit to TaxCaster shows Dr. A’s federal income tax bill on a $300,000 salary equals $49,391 (married with two children, $12,000 in mortgage interest, $5000 in donations, $42,750 in tax-deferred retirement and HSA contributions).Dropping her income to $150,000 lowers her federal income tax to $8,219.
Half the work, half the income,less than 20% the tax. To be fair, I should point out that she won’t see much, if any savings in social security tax, property tax, sales tax, etc… but still, the federal (and state) income taxes are drastically lower, demonstrating just how progressive a tax it is.