• Revenue Cycle Management
  • COVID-19
  • Reimbursement
  • Diabetes Awareness Month
  • Risk Management
  • Patient Retention
  • Staffing
  • Medical Economics® 100th Anniversary
  • Coding and documentation
  • Business of Endocrinology
  • Telehealth
  • Physicians Financial News
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cardiovascular Clinical Consult
  • Locum Tenens, brought to you by LocumLife®
  • Weight Management
  • Business of Women's Health
  • Practice Efficiency
  • Finance and Wealth
  • EHRs
  • Remote Patient Monitoring
  • Sponsored Webinars
  • Medical Technology
  • Billing and collections
  • Acute Pain Management
  • Exclusive Content
  • Value-based Care
  • Business of Pediatrics
  • Concierge Medicine 2.0 by Castle Connolly Private Health Partners
  • Practice Growth
  • Concierge Medicine
  • Business of Cardiology
  • Implementing the Topcon Ocular Telehealth Platform
  • Malpractice
  • Influenza
  • Sexual Health
  • Chronic Conditions
  • Technology
  • Legal and Policy
  • Money
  • Opinion
  • Vaccines
  • Practice Management
  • Patient Relations
  • Careers

RomneyCare: Canary in the coal mine not looking very healthy


The continuing pressure on the primary care system will be significant if so-called RomneyCare in Massachusetts is a harbinger for national healthcare reform, as some critics have claimed. Read on to see how primary care physicians there have coped.


If so-called RomneyCare in Massachusetts is a harbinger for national healthcare reform, as some critics have claimed, then the continuing pressure on the primary care system will be significant.

A recent survey by the Massachusetts Medical Society (MMS) found that more than half of primary care practices in the Commonwealth are closed to new patients. In addition, wait times to get appointments with both primary care doctors and specialists are increasing, and fewer practices are participating in key government healthcare programs, according to the survey, which is part of the MMS’s annual Physician Workforce Study.

In terms of primary care, the survey, based on 838 telephone interviews, found that 51% of internists and 53% of family physicians are not accepting new patients, similar to last year’s figures. According to MMS officials, those figures illustrate a continuing and serious shortage of primary caregivers. Other findings:

  • The average wait time for an appointment with a family medicine practitioner was 36 days, 7 days longer than in last year’s survey.

  • The wait time in internal medicine was 48 days, a slight drop from last year.

  • 73% of pediatric practices were accepting new patients, and the wait time was 24 days.

How have primary care practices in Massachusetts dealt with that state’s healthcare reform efforts? A substantial number of Massachusetts’ primary care doctors have responded to the healthcare reform efforts by opting out of at least some of the programs, according to the survey:

  • While 85% of internists and 87% of family physicians accept Medicare, only 53% of internists and 62% of family physicians accept MassHealth, the public health insurance program for eligible low- and medium-income residents of Massachusetts.

  • 43% of internists and 56% of family physicians accept Commonwealth Care, a health insurance program that provides uninsured low- and moderate-income Massachusetts adults with free or low-cost health services through managed care health plans.

  • 35% of internists and 44% of family physicians accept Commonwealth Choice, a nonsubsidized health insurance program for uninsured adult Massachusetts residents.

  • 89% of pediatricians accept MassHealth, but only 50% accept Commonwealth Care and only 45% accept Commonwealth Choice.

“Massachusetts has made great strides in securing insurance coverage for its citizens, but insurance coverage doesn’t equal access to care. We still have much work to do to reduce wait times and widen access,” Alice Coombs, MD, president of the Massachusetts Medical Society, said in a statement.

Go back to the current issue of eConsult.

Related Videos