• Revenue Cycle Management
  • COVID-19
  • Reimbursement
  • Diabetes Awareness Month
  • Risk Management
  • Patient Retention
  • Staffing
  • Medical Economics® 100th Anniversary
  • Coding and documentation
  • Business of Endocrinology
  • Telehealth
  • Physicians Financial News
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cardiovascular Clinical Consult
  • Locum Tenens, brought to you by LocumLife®
  • Weight Management
  • Business of Women's Health
  • Practice Efficiency
  • Finance and Wealth
  • EHRs
  • Remote Patient Monitoring
  • Sponsored Webinars
  • Medical Technology
  • Billing and collections
  • Acute Pain Management
  • Exclusive Content
  • Value-based Care
  • Business of Pediatrics
  • Concierge Medicine 2.0 by Castle Connolly Private Health Partners
  • Practice Growth
  • Concierge Medicine
  • Business of Cardiology
  • Implementing the Topcon Ocular Telehealth Platform
  • Malpractice
  • Influenza
  • Sexual Health
  • Chronic Conditions
  • Technology
  • Legal and Policy
  • Money
  • Opinion
  • Vaccines
  • Practice Management
  • Patient Relations
  • Careers

Reform payment systems to increase efficiency


A reader asserts that reducing the administrative burden on doctors would allow them to practice more efficiently.

We could readily address the shortage of physicians by increasing physician efficiency. (“There are no easy answers to scope of practice debate,” September 10, 2013). The fastest, cheapest, and easiest way to do that is to limit all administrative incentives, concerns, and liabilities of our current billing and payment systems.

I volunteer at a free medical clinic. I probably can see three to four times more patients compared to my private practice because I am not concerned about billing and documentation issues. The focus is on good patient care and documentation required for providing that care.

The other advantage would come from the greater clinical experience. Physicians who care for more patients are likely to be better-skilled and better able to get to the point quickly, and then have the time to educate and discuss preventive measures. 

Physicians who develop good relationships with their patients have better outcomes while spending less. Where do we provide the incentives in our current system for this obvious outcome determinant? Indeed, one could say the incentives/pressures interfere with proper therapeutic relationships. Given the administrative concerns and liabilities involved with not crossing the T’s and dotting the I’s, physicians are understandably stressed.

In Washington State, if a physician makes an error repeatedly in billing or documentation in Medicaid patients they can be charged with criminal fraud. No intent needs to be established. The service provided, however necessary, cost-effective, and professional does not constitute an adequate defense. I wonder how these sorts of liabilities will influence physician readiness to see more Medicaid patients?

 J. Kimber Rotchford, MD, MPH

Port Townsend, Washington


Related Videos
Mike Bannon ©CSG Partners
Mike Bannon ©CSG Partners
Mike Bannon - ©CSG Partners
Mike Bannon - ©CSG Partners