Banner

Article

Politicos, medical groups renew cries to repeal Medicare’s SGR formula

Although a bill pending in the U.S. House of Representatives has drawn widespread support for repealing the Sustainable Growth Rate formula, groups representing primary care physicians have raised some concerns.

Twenty medical groups have thrown their support to a new bill in the U.S. House of Representatives to repeal the sustainable growth rate (SGR) formula that determines Medicare reimbursement for physicians.

But for practicing physicians, one of the bill’s main provisions has raised concerns. The proposal calls for annual reimbursement hikes of 0.5% from 2014 through 2018. Payment incentives such as the Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) and the electronic health record (EHR) Meaningful Use incentive program will continue during that time.

The 0.5% annual payment increase lags inflation, which generally has hovered around 2% to 3% over the last few years.

So the question looms: Is that 0.5% annual increase an appropriate amount? The answer, of course, depends on whom you ask, but there’s strong sentiment among some health policy observers that it’s not enough of an increase for primary care services.

"The 0.5% does seem appropriate for non-primary care services -as long as it is closely monitored to determine its impact on patient access,” says David Kinsman, a spokesman for the American College of Physicians (ACP).  “If patient access is adversely affected, then the update should be adjusted.”

The ACP is calling for annual increases of 2.5% for primary care services-commonly defined as evaluation and management codes-between 2015 and 2018, while holding annual updates for non-primary care services at 0.5%.

The American Academy of Family Physicians has also issued a statement expressing disappointment with the base payment for primary care services as outlined in the draft legislation.

 

Related Videos
The new standard for medical malpractice: A conversation with Daniel G. Aaron, M.D., J.D.
The new standard for medical malpractice: What to watch for
The new standard for medical malpractice: A step toward ending defensive medicine?
The new standard for medical malpractice: Can doctors be liable for doing what everyone else does?
The new standard for medical malpractice: What makes a clinical guideline legally defensible?
The new standard for medical malpractice: What it means for day-to-day practice
The new standard for medical malpractice: What changed?
The new standard for medical malpractice: Why the law just changed
Locum tenens physicians — Lisa Grabl © CHG Healthcare