Banner

Article

Letter: MOC doesn't focus on the real medical world of primary care

A reader says the certification exam for internal medicine has little relevance to his practice.

As a 64 year old primary care physician taking the MOC exam for the third time in 10 year sequences, I read your recent cover article with great interest.

From my point of view, aside from its essential coercive and punitive rather than educational focus, there is a more central fallacy to the internal medicine exam.

It is essentially a sub-specialist created test that quizzes generalists by repeatedly asking them to make decisions after reviewing cardiac catheter data or viewing renal biopsies. These are responsibilities and decisions that simply do not exist in the real medical world of the primary care physician.

It not only makes the entire experience useless but in reality for an office-based generalist invalidates any conclusions regarding physician competence or quality of care.

David C. Sobel, MD, FACP
Edison, New Jersey

Related Videos
The new standard for medical malpractice: A conversation with Daniel G. Aaron, M.D., J.D.
The new standard for medical malpractice: What to watch for
The new standard for medical malpractice: A step toward ending defensive medicine?
The new standard for medical malpractice: Can doctors be liable for doing what everyone else does?
The new standard for medical malpractice: What makes a clinical guideline legally defensible?
The new standard for medical malpractice: What it means for day-to-day practice
The new standard for medical malpractice: What changed?
The new standard for medical malpractice: Why the law just changed
Locum tenens physicians — Lisa Grabl © CHG Healthcare