Banner
  • Revenue Cycle Management
  • COVID-19
  • Reimbursement
  • Diabetes Awareness Month
  • Risk Management
  • Patient Retention
  • Staffing
  • Medical Economics® 100th Anniversary
  • Coding and documentation
  • Business of Endocrinology
  • Telehealth
  • Physicians Financial News
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cardiovascular Clinical Consult
  • Locum Tenens, brought to you by LocumLife®
  • Weight Management
  • Business of Women's Health
  • Practice Efficiency
  • Finance and Wealth
  • EHRs
  • Remote Patient Monitoring
  • Sponsored Webinars
  • Medical Technology
  • Billing and collections
  • Acute Pain Management
  • Exclusive Content
  • Value-based Care
  • Business of Pediatrics
  • Concierge Medicine 2.0 by Castle Connolly Private Health Partners
  • Practice Growth
  • Concierge Medicine
  • Business of Cardiology
  • Implementing the Topcon Ocular Telehealth Platform
  • Malpractice
  • Influenza
  • Sexual Health
  • Chronic Conditions
  • Technology
  • Legal and Policy
  • Money
  • Opinion
  • Vaccines
  • Practice Management
  • Patient Relations
  • Careers

Letter: Malpractice study's results are flawed

Article

A reader disagrees with the results of a study on the links between fears of malpractice and defensive medicine practices.

I disagree with the conclusions reached in “Study: Weak Link Between Malpractice Fears And Defensive Medicine” (Medical Economics, November 25, 2014.)

They are misleading because the study did not take into account that doctors have conditioned themselves to practice defensive medicine for at least the past two decades and the result is that for many of them defensive medicine has become so habitual that many consider it good medicine.

Unfortunately, this bad habit will take a long time to break regardless of the type and number of malpractice reforms put into place.

Moreover, the time span of the study (1997-2011) is much too short to draw any valid conclusions from it. And it did not mention whether the magnetic resonance imaging and computerized tomography scans that were not done in the emergency department were performed later as outpatients by their primary care doctors or whether the intensity (and cost) of the visits were lessened because the patients were referred to specialists or to their primary care physicians to complete their evaluations.

Much more study needs to be done before it can be said that malpractice reform has not been as effective as expected.

Clearly, malpractice continues to be the “X Factor” that drives the cost of health care.

Edward Volpintesta, MD

 Bethel, Connecticut

Related Videos
Jennifer N. Lee, MD, FAAFP
© National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
© National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
© National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
© National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
© National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
© National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health