Article

Letter to the editor: MOC not needed as long as CME is maintained

A reader writes that he has been recertified four times and met his continuing medical education requirements, so he should not be required to do maintenance of certification again.

I am 74 and have been in family medicine for over 45 years. I took my family physician boards for the first time in 1975, and passed them. I have taken my recertification exams four times since then, passing each time. I have kept up my continuing medical education as required, and even teach medical students.

My board certification expired in 2009. I did not take the exam again, since I felt that five times was enough. I also mistakenly thought that I would remain in a situation in case I ever decided to retake the exam. However, I see no need to do this at my stage of life, since I do not know how long I will continue practicing.

I have discovered that I am not considered board eligible, unless I complete three requirements, including one “self-assessment module,” for $600. I do comply with the other two requirements. I feel this is grossly unfair, and that I should be considered grandfathered as a board-certified family physician, or at least be granted an emeritus position. I feel the recertification process is nothing more than a way to make money, and should be done away with as long as continuing medical education requirements are maintained.

I have been offered a certificate, congratulating me for passing my boards five times, “suitable for framing.” Just thought I would offer my opinion on the MOC situation. 

 Enrico J. DiRienzo, MD

Penndel, Pennsylvania

Newsletter

Stay informed and empowered with Medical Economics enewsletter, delivering expert insights, financial strategies, practice management tips and technology trends — tailored for today’s physicians.

Related Videos
The new standard for medical malpractice: A conversation with Daniel G. Aaron, M.D., J.D.
The new standard for medical malpractice: What to watch for
The new standard for medical malpractice: A step toward ending defensive medicine?
The new standard for medical malpractice: Can doctors be liable for doing what everyone else does?
The new standard for medical malpractice: What makes a clinical guideline legally defensible?
The new standard for medical malpractice: What it means for day-to-day practice
The new standard for medical malpractice: What changed?
The new standard for medical malpractice: Why the law just changed
Locum tenens physicians — Lisa Grabl © CHG Healthcare