Banner

Article

Letter to the editor: Insurance preapproval process is frustrating, cumbersome

A reader proposes alternatives to the need to obtain insurance company preapprovals for treatments and procedures.

As an ophthalmologist I have many disturbing encounters with insurance companies and pharmacies. First, it takes more than an hour of my secretary’s time, and quite often my time, to get approval for tests such as magnetic resonance imaging when I have to request to talk to a physician to get approval for such tests or even emergency procedures such as laser surgery for retinal hemorrhage.

Insurance companies prefer to pay only for generic medications, which is fine, but occasionally a patient may need a drug not yet available generically. In cases where generic medications are ineffective, the ordeal becomes cumbersome for the patient, my secretary, and me.

The solution is legislation to 1) create single-payer insurance, 2) reduce the red tape for approval of tests, procedures and medications, and 3) enact legislation that  pharmacies must honor a) when the prescription is marked “dispense as written” to give only the generic substitute of the drug prescribed and b) deal with the insurance company when the prescription is marked ‘medical necessity.’

Heskel M. Haddad, MD

New York, New York

Related Videos
The new standard for medical malpractice: A conversation with Daniel G. Aaron, M.D., J.D.
The new standard for medical malpractice: What to watch for
The new standard for medical malpractice: A step toward ending defensive medicine?
The new standard for medical malpractice: Can doctors be liable for doing what everyone else does?
The new standard for medical malpractice: What makes a clinical guideline legally defensible?
The new standard for medical malpractice: What it means for day-to-day practice
The new standard for medical malpractice: What changed?
The new standard for medical malpractice: Why the law just changed
Locum tenens physicians — Lisa Grabl © CHG Healthcare