Medical Economics Logo
  • Physicians Money Digest

  • Physicians Financial News

  • Physicians Practice

  • Chief Healthcare Executive

  • Patient Care Online

All NewsCareersLegalMoneyOpinionPhysicians Financial NewsPractice ManagementTechnology
Around the PracticeBetween The LinesClinical ConsultExpert InterviewsMedical Economics PulseMedical World NewsOff The Charts PodcastsPhysician ReportPrimaryViewSlideshows
Academy
Conference CoverageConference Listing
Medical EconomicsPatient Care SupplementSponsored ContentSponsored ResourcesSupplements And Featured Publications
CME/CEJob BoardSubscribe
Financial Advisor Guide
CareersCareersCareersCareersCareersCareersCareersCareersCareers
LegalLegalLegalLegalLegal
Medical Device & TechnologyMedical Device & TechnologyMedical Device & TechnologyMedical Device & TechnologyMedical Device & TechnologyMedical Device & TechnologyMedical Device & TechnologyMedical Device & TechnologyMedical Device & TechnologyMedical Device & TechnologyMedical Device & Technology
Opinion
Physician's Money DigestPhysician's Money DigestPhysician's Money DigestPhysician's Money Digest
PolicyPolicyPolicyPolicyPolicyPolicy
Practice FinancePractice FinancePractice FinancePractice FinancePractice FinancePractice FinancePractice Finance
Practice ManagementPractice ManagementPractice ManagementPractice ManagementPractice ManagementPractice ManagementPractice ManagementPractice Management
Practice TechnologyPractice TechnologyPractice TechnologyPractice TechnologyPractice TechnologyPractice TechnologyPractice Technology
Screening
Special ReportsSpecial ReportsSpecial Reports
Spotlight -
  • The benefits of a physician MBA program
  • Concierge Medicine 2.0 by Castle Connolly Private Health Partners
  • Physician Bootcamp
  • Physician Report
CareersCareersCareersCareersCareersCareersCareersCareersCareers
LegalLegalLegalLegalLegal
Medical Device & TechnologyMedical Device & TechnologyMedical Device & TechnologyMedical Device & TechnologyMedical Device & TechnologyMedical Device & TechnologyMedical Device & TechnologyMedical Device & TechnologyMedical Device & TechnologyMedical Device & TechnologyMedical Device & Technology
Opinion
Physician's Money DigestPhysician's Money DigestPhysician's Money DigestPhysician's Money Digest
PolicyPolicyPolicyPolicyPolicyPolicy
Practice FinancePractice FinancePractice FinancePractice FinancePractice FinancePractice FinancePractice Finance
Practice ManagementPractice ManagementPractice ManagementPractice ManagementPractice ManagementPractice ManagementPractice ManagementPractice Management
Practice TechnologyPractice TechnologyPractice TechnologyPractice TechnologyPractice TechnologyPractice TechnologyPractice Technology
Screening
Special ReportsSpecial ReportsSpecial Reports
    • Academy
    • CME/CE
    • Job Board
    • Subscribe
Advertisement

Article

December 25, 2015

Legal and ethical considerations for managing your online reputation

Author(s):

Kevin G. Donoghue, JD,Stacey P. Klein, JD

With statistics showing that patients are increasingly going online for healthcare information, managing a physician’s online reputation within the confines of the law and policies regulating professional behavior is becoming more important than ever.

Social media and the proliferation of online physician rating sites have made it incumbent on healthcare providers to monitor their online reputations. While patient satisfaction is not always a reliable indicator of quality medical care, it is the new reality that providers face. It is advisable for physicians to be proactive and establish a protocol for requesting patients to provide online reviews of their experience on provider rating sites.

Read more from Legally Speaking

Developing a positive online reputation through reviews posted by satisfied patients is the single best way to defend against any online negative reviews that may ultimately befall a practitioner. Indeed, when a negative review is one of no more than a handful of reviews, it can carry a disproportionate amount of weight to the present or prospective patient. However, the negative review appearing in a sea of hundreds of positive reviews is more likely to be seen by the world as an aberration.

If a provider’s reputation comes under attack from a patient’s use of social media or a negative online review, and the provider decides that a response is needed, the method should be driven by analyzing a variety of factors, including the extent of the harm that could be done by responding to the reputational attack.

If the provider knows the patient, he or she can try to reach out to the patient privately try to address any concerns. If the provider doesn’t know the patient, often the best course is to work with an attorney to craft a fair, broad, and general response to the patient’s claim to post on the social media or online review site.

The response should focus attention on the physician’s experience and policies with regard to such situations, express surprise and concern regarding the claim, and assure the public that the physician does not manage his or her practice in the manner the patient is alleging in the online review.

Next: If all else fails...

 

Depending on the contents of the review and the website on which it appears, there are various other options open to the physician beyond calling a patient in hopes of resolving any issue. These include sending a demand or “cease and desist” letter to the patient, or contacting the website in a manner consistent with the website’s terms of service.

If all else fails, physicians can pursue the “nuclear option” of a defamation lawsuit against patients who make particularly unfair or inaccurate online postings. In certain cases, the cost and uncertainty of litigation provides both the physician and the patient with the impetus to resolve the issue and can help to have it taken down or otherwise amended.

Recognizing that social media use by physicians and their patients presents unique challenges for physicians, medical associations and medical boards have developed guidelines to help physicians navigate their roles online. The guidelines urge practitioners to proceed cautiously, act professionally, and avoiding any personal connections to patients online. Failing to do so entails certain risks, including a claim of professional misconduct.

 

Kevin G. Donoghue, JD, is a partner, and Stacey P. Klein, JD, is an associate at Garfunkel Wild, P.C., in Great Neck, New York. Send your legal questions to [email protected].

Newsletter

Stay informed and empowered with Medical Economics enewsletter, delivering expert insights, financial strategies, practice management tips and technology trends — tailored for today’s physicians.

Subscribe Now!
Related Videos
The new standard for medical malpractice: A conversation with Daniel G. Aaron, M.D., J.D.
The new standard for medical malpractice: What to watch for
The new standard for medical malpractice: A step toward ending defensive medicine?
The new standard for medical malpractice: Can doctors be liable for doing what everyone else does?
The new standard for medical malpractice: What makes a clinical guideline legally defensible?
The new standard for medical malpractice: What it means for day-to-day practice
The new standard for medical malpractice: What changed?
The new standard for medical malpractice: Why the law just changed
Locum tenens physicians — Lisa Grabl © CHG Healthcare
Related Content
Advertisement
Matt Coursen: ©JLL
July 9th 2025

Does your real estate support the growth plans of your private practice?

Zed Williamson and the Physician Growth Accelerator Podcast featured on Medical Economics
June 21st 2025

The peril of relying on one person at your practice

How the nursing shortage will affect private physician practice
July 2nd 2025

How the nursing shortage will affect private physician practice

Off the Chart: A Business of Medicine Podcast - Ep. 69: The physician shortage with Brian McKillop of AMN Healthcare
June 16th 2025

Ep. 69: The physician shortage with Brian McKillop of AMN Healthcare

Peter Reilly: ©HUB International
July 1st 2025

How medical employers can better manage their rising health insurance costs

57% of patients say yes to AI in the exam room if it means more time with their doctor © InfiniteFlow - stock.adobe.com
July 1st 2025

57% of patients say yes to AI in the exam room if it means more time with their doctor

Related Content
Advertisement
Matt Coursen: ©JLL
July 9th 2025

Does your real estate support the growth plans of your private practice?

Zed Williamson and the Physician Growth Accelerator Podcast featured on Medical Economics
June 21st 2025

The peril of relying on one person at your practice

How the nursing shortage will affect private physician practice
July 2nd 2025

How the nursing shortage will affect private physician practice

Off the Chart: A Business of Medicine Podcast - Ep. 69: The physician shortage with Brian McKillop of AMN Healthcare
June 16th 2025

Ep. 69: The physician shortage with Brian McKillop of AMN Healthcare

Peter Reilly: ©HUB International
July 1st 2025

How medical employers can better manage their rising health insurance costs

57% of patients say yes to AI in the exam room if it means more time with their doctor © InfiniteFlow - stock.adobe.com
July 1st 2025

57% of patients say yes to AI in the exam room if it means more time with their doctor

About
Advertise
Contact Us
Editorial Staff
Job Board
Terms and Conditions
Contributor Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Contact Info

2 Commerce Drive
Cranbury, NJ 08512

609-716-7777

© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.