Banner

Article

IOM: Practices and public health must collaborate

The Institute of Medicine says your practice should work with public health organizations in your community. Discover the potential payoffs.

The Institute of Medicine (IOM) believes your practice and your community’s public health officials need to work together.

The traditional separation between primary care physicians (PCPs) and public health professionals is hurting population health, says a new report from the IOM.

The report highlights examples such as the Community Care of North Carolina (CCNC) program, which is a statewide organization to coordinate and improve the care quality for Medicaid recipients. One network, based in Durham, is organized and operated by PCPs, hospitals, health departments, and departments of social services and funded by per capita payments from Medicaid. The network is responsible for improving outcomes and achieving cost savings. The primary care practices that work with the CCNC receive additional per capita payments from Medicaid to help achieve the network’s goals, according to the report.

The report also cites the Healthy San Francisco project in California, run by the city’s health department. It links uninsured residents with primary care practices that are compensated through the project. The report lauds a city-funded program in New York City called Take Care New York. It, in part, assists PCPs with care coordination for patients with diabetes, high cholesterol, hypertension, and smoking.

In the report, the IOM does not advocate for a complete merger of primary care and public health organizations. Every community will be different, and not all will be able to achieve true partnership, it says. In some communities, achieving mutual awareness will mark a significant step forward, but it will be useful to strive for greater integration when possible.

“While integrating fields that have long operated separately may seem like a daunting endeavor, our nation has undertaken many major [healthcare] initiatives,” said committee chairman Paul J. Wallace, senior vice president and director, Center for Comparative Effectiveness Research, in a statement. “It's time we did the same for primary care and public health, which together form the foundation of our population's overall well-being.”

Go back to current issue of eConsult

Related Content

Giving (and getting) back to your community

Doctoring in Haiti: 2 weeks with the poorest of the poor

Institute of Medicine recommends Medicare adjust regional cost calculations

FDA creating mobile app for use during public health crises

Treating the underserved: You call this an incentive?

Related Videos
The new standard for medical malpractice: A conversation with Daniel G. Aaron, M.D., J.D.
The new standard for medical malpractice: What to watch for
The new standard for medical malpractice: A step toward ending defensive medicine?
The new standard for medical malpractice: Can doctors be liable for doing what everyone else does?
The new standard for medical malpractice: What makes a clinical guideline legally defensible?
The new standard for medical malpractice: What it means for day-to-day practice
The new standard for medical malpractice: What changed?
The new standard for medical malpractice: Why the law just changed
Locum tenens physicians — Lisa Grabl © CHG Healthcare