• Revenue Cycle Management
  • COVID-19
  • Reimbursement
  • Diabetes Awareness Month
  • Risk Management
  • Patient Retention
  • Staffing
  • Medical Economics® 100th Anniversary
  • Coding and documentation
  • Business of Endocrinology
  • Telehealth
  • Physicians Financial News
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cardiovascular Clinical Consult
  • Locum Tenens, brought to you by LocumLife®
  • Weight Management
  • Business of Women's Health
  • Practice Efficiency
  • Finance and Wealth
  • EHRs
  • Remote Patient Monitoring
  • Sponsored Webinars
  • Medical Technology
  • Billing and collections
  • Acute Pain Management
  • Exclusive Content
  • Value-based Care
  • Business of Pediatrics
  • Concierge Medicine 2.0 by Castle Connolly Private Health Partners
  • Practice Growth
  • Concierge Medicine
  • Business of Cardiology
  • Implementing the Topcon Ocular Telehealth Platform
  • Malpractice
  • Influenza
  • Sexual Health
  • Chronic Conditions
  • Technology
  • Legal and Policy
  • Money
  • Opinion
  • Vaccines
  • Practice Management
  • Patient Relations
  • Careers

Fund Fees - Size Does Matter


If you compare the performance of high-cost, actively-managed funds to that of a low-cost index bond fund, chances are you’ll find that the extra money you’re paying isn’t buying you a track record that would justify the added cost.

When an actively managed fund is chalking up big gains, the fact that it charges three or four times as much as a similar low-cost index fund doesn’t seem to make a lot of difference. Surprisingly, the same psychology kicks in when losses go into double digits. How much worse is a 20% loss than an 18.5% loss? It’s when gains and losses get razor thin that the difference between a costly fund and a cheapskate one stands out.

Take the recent rush into bond funds. Of the more than $200 billion investors have shoveled into bond funds so far this year, the bulk is going into actively managed funds, which charge an average of 1.03% to invest your money, according to Morningstar, the mutual fund research firm. Some charge almost 3% of your assets. With 10-year Treasuries in the 3% to 4% range, those fees of funds that are primarily invested in federal government securities are taking a big bite out of any gains. Skinflint index funds, which charge as little as 0.22% of assets, are a better choice, say many investment advisors.

If 1% versus 0.22% doesn’t sound like a big difference, those same investment advisors suggest that you do the math. Multiply the assets in your bond fund by the fund’s expense ratio to come up with a dollar amount. How would you feel if you had to write a check for that amount once a year? Then compare that number with the amount you’d pay to a low-cost index bond fund. If you also compare the funds’ performance, chances are you’ll find that the extra money you’re paying isn’t buying you a track record that would justify the added cost.

Related Videos
Victor J. Dzau, MD, gives expert advice
Victor J. Dzau, MD, gives expert advice