
ICD-10 deadline sparks battle of titans: AMA vs. CMS
The American Medical Association House of Delegates has voted to “work vigorously to stop implementation of ICD-10” by an October 2013 deadline. But don’t get your hopes up. The smart money is probably on the government. Find out what the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services said about changing the deadline, and why the agency is so anxious to start using the new coding system.
The American Medical Association (AMA) House of Delegates has voted to “work vigorously to stop implementation of ICD-10” by a government-imposed deadline in 2013. But don’t get your hopes up. The smart money probably is on the health agency bureaucrats.
Under current regulations, all Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) entities must adopt the International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision (ICD-10), by October 1, 2013. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has left no wiggle room, stating in a
The issue came up for a vote at the AMA’s semi-annual meeting in November. “The implementation of
A three-physician practice would spend $83,290 on the conversion, and a 10-physician practice would be out $285,195 to adopt the new codes, said the AMA, drawing on costs calculated by
The problem is that the United States is almost 20 years late in making the switch. ICD-10 was widely adopted in Europe and elsewhere by 1994. CMS pushed back the date for ICD-10 implementation by 2 years in 2009 but has consistently said that the 2013 deadline is firm. The World Health Organization, which creates the coding systems, has said that an even newer version, ICD-11, will be ready in 2015.
Related Content
Newsletter
Stay informed and empowered with Medical Economics enewsletter, delivering expert insights, financial strategies, practice management tips and technology trends — tailored for today’s physicians.















