• Revenue Cycle Management
  • COVID-19
  • Reimbursement
  • Diabetes Awareness Month
  • Risk Management
  • Patient Retention
  • Staffing
  • Medical Economics® 100th Anniversary
  • Coding and documentation
  • Business of Endocrinology
  • Telehealth
  • Physicians Financial News
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cardiovascular Clinical Consult
  • Locum Tenens, brought to you by LocumLife®
  • Weight Management
  • Business of Women's Health
  • Practice Efficiency
  • Finance and Wealth
  • EHRs
  • Remote Patient Monitoring
  • Sponsored Webinars
  • Medical Technology
  • Billing and collections
  • Acute Pain Management
  • Exclusive Content
  • Value-based Care
  • Business of Pediatrics
  • Concierge Medicine 2.0 by Castle Connolly Private Health Partners
  • Practice Growth
  • Concierge Medicine
  • Business of Cardiology
  • Implementing the Topcon Ocular Telehealth Platform
  • Malpractice
  • Influenza
  • Sexual Health
  • Chronic Conditions
  • Technology
  • Legal and Policy
  • Money
  • Opinion
  • Vaccines
  • Practice Management
  • Patient Relations
  • Careers

How Much Can You Safely Withdraw During Retirement?


Many physicians planning for retirement often wonder how much they'll be able to safely withdraw. In the past, people followed the 4% rule, but the method doesn't really apply anymore.

My physician clients often ask me questions like, "Am I on track to retire when I want?” or "When will I know if I have enough money to retire?” Inevitably, those clients end up asking, “How much can I safely withdraw from my retirement account?”

People often read about a “safe withdrawal rate” of 4%, which was proposed by financial planner William Bengen in 1994 in the Journal of Financial Planning. He hypothesized that one could take an initial withdrawal from a retirement portfolio of 4% of the balance and then increase the initial amount by the inflation rate each year in order to keep pace with inflation.

For example, in the hypothetical case of a 65-year-old physician with a $3 million retirement portfolio, this methodology would say the doctor could withdraw 4% or $120,000 for the first year of retirement. If we assume that inflation was 2% for that year, then next year when the doctor is 66, he can take out $122,400 — his initial withdrawal indexed for inflation. By doing this over a 30-year retirement span, Bengen suggested that the chances of running out of money were very low, hence a safe withdrawal rate.

In the last few years, however, many experts have questioned whether this “Four Percent Drawdown Rule” method is accurate or useful. Some have argued 4% is too low an initial rate and the doctor would needlessly be living on less than he could. This school of thought suggests an initial withdrawal rate of 5% or 6%, particularly if the doctor is willing to forego inflation raises, or even cut back spending in years when the portfolio performs poorly or declines in value.

Others have argued the 4% withdrawal rate is too optimistic and was based on historical return assumptions from 1994 (a period of very favorable market conditions) and should not be generalized from the historical returns of the U.S. stock and bond markets almost 20 years ago.

In Bengen’s work, the historical return of common stocks he used in his analysis was 10.3%. For intermediate-term Treasuries, he used 5.1%. This resulted in a “balanced portfolio” of 60% stocks and 40% bonds returning 8.2% per year. These are return figures that financial planners in 2014 would be unlikely to project out into the future. These planners would argue a safe withdrawal rate of 2% or 3% is more prudent. That would result in an initial withdrawal of $60,000 or $90,000 on a hypothetical $3 million portfolio rather than the $120,000 initial withdrawal in our first example.

Who is right? With today's market valuation, which seems elevated, I am concerned about the investment returns doctors can expect going forward and would be reluctant to advise a 4% initial withdrawal rate.

Rather than relying on rule-of thumb projections that range from 2% to 6%, it appears more prudent to use a robust analysis that includes:

• An individual's sources of retirement income

• Expected longevity

• Expected portfolio return given his or her asset allocation

In addition, the analysis should be rerun every year or two as circumstances and inputs will change. This method can lead to a more reliable result than that from a shortcut estimate like the 4% rate, helping you to more accurately plan your retirement withdrawals.

Joel Greenwald, MD, CFP, is a physician-turned financial planner who exclusively provides financial advice to doctors. He has written many articles and been a frequent speaker on how physicians and dentists can achieve long-term financial security. More about Joel Greenwald and his Minnesota-based firm, Greenwald Wealth Management, can be found at www.joelgreenwald.com.

This communication is strictly intended for individuals residing in the states of (CA, FL, MN, NY, OH, PA, SD, WI). No offers may be made or accepted from any resident outside these states due to various state requirements and registration requirements regarding investment products and services. Securities and advisory services offered through Commonwealth Financial Network, www.FINRA.org/www.SIPC.org, a Registered Investment Adviser. Fixed insurance products and services offered by Greenwald Wealth Management, 1660 South Highway 100, Suite 270, St. Louis Park, MN. (952) 641-7595.

Related Videos
Victor J. Dzau, MD, gives expert advice
Victor J. Dzau, MD, gives expert advice