• Revenue Cycle Management
  • COVID-19
  • Diabetes Awareness Month
  • Staffing
  • Medical Economics® 100th Anniversary
  • Coding and documentation
  • Business of Endocrinology
  • Telehealth
  • Physicians Financial News
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cardiovascular Clinical Consult
  • Locum Tenens, brought to you by LocumLife®
  • Weight Management
  • Business of Women's Health
  • EHRs
  • Remote Patient Monitoring
  • Sponsored Webinars
  • Medical Technology
  • Billing and collections
  • Acute Pain Management
  • Exclusive Content
  • Value-based Care
  • Business of Pediatrics
  • Concierge Medicine 2.0 by Castle Connolly Private Health Partners
  • Concierge Medicine
  • Business of Cardiology
  • Implementing the Topcon Ocular Telehealth Platform
  • Malpractice
  • Influenza
  • Sexual Health
  • Chronic Conditions
  • Technology
  • Legal and Policy
  • Money
  • Opinion
  • Vaccines
  • Practice Management
  • Patient Relations
  • Careers

GOP budget proposal calls for ACA repeal, Medicare transformation


The Republican-sponsored bill would cut $5.1 trillion in spending, but has little chance of becoming law

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) would be repealed, and people 55 or younger would have more options for Medicare coverage when they turn 65 under a federal budget proposal wending its way through the U.S. House of Representatives.

The budget proposal was unveiled April 1 by U.S. Rep. Paul Ryan, chair of the House budget committee and the Republican’s 2012 vice presidential candidate.  

While the proposal may be passed by the Republican-controlled House, political observers say it has no chance of passage in the Democratically-controlled Senate, which probably won’t even consider it. 

The proposal, titled “The Path to Prosperity,” cuts federal spending by $5.1 trillion as part of an effort to balance the federal budget in 10 years. Among other steps for achieving that goal, it would:

  • repeal the ACA,

  • give people who turn 65 in 2024 and afterwards the choice of enrolling in traditional Medicare or enrolling in a private plan on a newly-created “Medicare Exchange,”

  • provide a premium-support payment either to pay for entirely or partially offset the Medicare private plan premium, depending on the plan’s cost,

  • give states block grants with which to fund the federal portion of Medicaid expenses

Most news media outlets dismissed the budget proposal as little more than a political document. The New York Times, in an editorial, said “This is a document designed solely to be reduced to a few bullet points so House Republicans can have something to show their most antigovernment voters.” The website Politico called it “little more than a political document to serve as an outline of Republican priorities going into the November election.”

The budget committee approved the proposal April 2 on a party-line vote of 22-16, and the full house is expected to vote on it the week of April 7.


Related Videos
Georges C. Benjamin, MD
Robert E. Oshel, PhD
Gary Price, MD, MBA
Gary Price, MD, MBA
Victor J. Dzau, MD, gives expert advice
Claire Ernst, JD, gives expert advice
Claire Ernst, JD, gives expert advice
Claire Ernst, JD, gives expert advice
Ron Holder, MHA, gives expert advice
remote patient monitoring
© 2023 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.