Banner
  • Revenue Cycle Management
  • COVID-19
  • Reimbursement
  • Diabetes Awareness Month
  • Risk Management
  • Patient Retention
  • Staffing
  • Medical Economics® 100th Anniversary
  • Coding and documentation
  • Business of Endocrinology
  • Telehealth
  • Physicians Financial News
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cardiovascular Clinical Consult
  • Locum Tenens, brought to you by LocumLife®
  • Weight Management
  • Business of Women's Health
  • Practice Efficiency
  • Finance and Wealth
  • EHRs
  • Remote Patient Monitoring
  • Sponsored Webinars
  • Medical Technology
  • Billing and collections
  • Acute Pain Management
  • Exclusive Content
  • Value-based Care
  • Business of Pediatrics
  • Concierge Medicine 2.0 by Castle Connolly Private Health Partners
  • Practice Growth
  • Concierge Medicine
  • Business of Cardiology
  • Implementing the Topcon Ocular Telehealth Platform
  • Malpractice
  • Influenza
  • Sexual Health
  • Chronic Conditions
  • Technology
  • Legal and Policy
  • Money
  • Opinion
  • Vaccines
  • Practice Management
  • Patient Relations
  • Careers

Certificate of need laws vary widely by stae

Article

The certificate of need process required to open a new medical facility has evolved into an arena where providers complete service-line dominance and market share, according to a new study.

The certificate-of-need (CON) process required to open a new medical facility has evolved into an arena where providers compete for service-line dominance and market share, according to a new study conducted by the Center for Studying Health System Change for the National Institute for Health Care Reform.

CON laws remain in 36 states and the District of Columbia, according to the study, which focused on CON requirements in six states-Connecticut, Georgia, Illinois, Michigan, South Carolina, and Washington. In five of the six states studied-all except Michigan-the CON approval process can be highly subjective and tends to be influenced heavily by political relationships, such as a provider's clout, organizational size, or overall wealth and resources, rather than policy objectives, according to respondents in the six states.

Related Videos