• Revenue Cycle Management
  • COVID-19
  • Reimbursement
  • Diabetes Awareness Month
  • Risk Management
  • Patient Retention
  • Staffing
  • Medical Economics® 100th Anniversary
  • Coding and documentation
  • Business of Endocrinology
  • Telehealth
  • Physicians Financial News
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cardiovascular Clinical Consult
  • Locum Tenens, brought to you by LocumLife®
  • Weight Management
  • Business of Women's Health
  • Practice Efficiency
  • Finance and Wealth
  • EHRs
  • Remote Patient Monitoring
  • Sponsored Webinars
  • Medical Technology
  • Billing and collections
  • Acute Pain Management
  • Exclusive Content
  • Value-based Care
  • Business of Pediatrics
  • Concierge Medicine 2.0 by Castle Connolly Private Health Partners
  • Practice Growth
  • Concierge Medicine
  • Business of Cardiology
  • Implementing the Topcon Ocular Telehealth Platform
  • Malpractice
  • Influenza
  • Sexual Health
  • Chronic Conditions
  • Technology
  • Legal and Policy
  • Money
  • Opinion
  • Vaccines
  • Practice Management
  • Patient Relations
  • Careers

Balancing today’s spending against saving for tomorrow


Saving for the future and enjoying the present are two impulses that rarely go hand-in-hand. With Americans living longer, many worry that they may run out of money while still alive. Plan on averages, assumptions, and make a strategic plan in the years prior to retirement. Steven Podnos, MD, CFP offers advice on balancing saving for the future and paying for the present.

As we save for the future, we face an inherent tension. How much to put away for later instead of enjoying now. Most of the families I work with do not particularly wish to die wealthy, but instead would like to enjoy the fruits of their labor to the fullest extent possible, yet without running out of funds too early.

But the uncertainty of knowing just how much money one will need over decades of retirement is at best an educated guess. There are so many variables, perhaps the largest being just how long you (and your spouse) will live.

So, we plan on averages. We decide on what the desired lifestyle will probably cost, make an assumption about inflation causing adjustments to future purchasing power, and then go on to estimate a joint lifetime survival estimate. Using these factors, we can at least come up with a "number" that suggests we have enough money to retire.

But during the years prior to retirement, we are faced with how aggressively to save (versus spend). Sometimes it is obvious that we will easily reach our goals and can spend more of our income. Sometimes the opposite is true. This process requires periodic reappraisals of whether or not we are likely to reach our accumulation goal.

As we enter retirement, we again are faced with how much to spend. Do we really need or want the ability to spend on a level basis for up to four decades in retirement? Don't most people slow down activities and spending in their ninth decade? When we first enter retirement we are most interested in travel and doing other things that we have been waiting and saving for. Should we continue to deny ourselves the gratification of doing things we have "always wanted to do" in order to prepare for very old age?

It is tough. Most people face the tension involved with immediate versus delayed gratification. Most of us would feel remorse if we became sick and unable to do those things we have been saving for, and most of us know individuals this has happened to. Yet, we appropriately fear running out of money at a time in which that can't be fixed.

If you feel this tension, talk to your adviser and come up with a game plan and pace you can live with.

Steven Podnos, MD, CFP, is a critical care physician and fee-only financial planner. He is the principal of Wealth Care LLC in Central Florida.  E-mail him here.

Related Videos