OR WAIT null SECS
The multidisciplinary nature of healthcare requires a team approach to effectively navigate risks and opportunities.
The waves of change that are rolling onto the shores in healthcare are both constant and unpredictable. When coupled with the magnifying glass put over the industry-because it so greatly impacts every individual-the work of healthcare businesses and their leadership is constantly on stage.
While many industries can rely on the entrepreneur icon leadership model that has propelled companies like Apple, Tesla, and Facebook, the multidisciplinary nature of healthcare requires a team approach to effectively navigate the risks and opportunities.
I had the privilege of serving as chair of the Board of Trustees of Northwell Health, New York’s largest health system, over five years of great progress and transition under the leadership of Michael Dowling. Over that time, I saw firsthand the impact team-focused leadership can have on successfully executing a complex, ambitious strategy in a hyper-competitive industry. The building blocks of this ethos aren’t rocket science, but they are critical for success in today’s fast-evolving healthcare ecosystem.
Seek and Utilize Board Expertise
A key reason why singular leadership doesn’t work is that running and growing a quality-focused healthcare services business requires such a vast set of knowledge that there’s no way one leader can amass the required expertise. Regulation, technology, and patient care are just the tip of the iceberg of knowledge needed to craft and execute strategy and avoid headline risks. Quality leadership requires the humility to know where you need support. To fill these gaps, I have learned first-hand the benefits of a Board of Trustees that bring real expertise to the table, and the imperative to add members with specialized expertise as you enter ancillary businesses and strategic partnerships.
For many healthcare organizations, real estate is a vital consideration and meaningful cost center, and yet notably outside the deep knowledge base of the administration. At Northwell Health, we were able to use several experts on our Board as we made real estate expansion and utilization decisions. Thanks to this capability – as well as an enterprising staff – Northwell has opened and has or will revamp a variety of market-leading facilities, including New York state’s first freestanding emergency care facility, Lenox Health Greenwich Village at the former site of St. Vincent’s Hospital, and the proposed redevelopment of Lenox Hill Hospital. Unquestionably, the Board’s knowledge and experience has and will continue to play a vital role in advising management on structuring and financing the Lenox Hill real estate transaction and redevelopment process, and similarly on the creation of a new cancer care center on the East Side of Manhattan.
However, members of the Board, like any administrator, can fall victim to being overwhelmed by too much information. Too often, Board members are reviewing reams of data involved in oversight. On one hand, this seems logical – after all, they are both personally and professional liable. However, attempting to take in this amount of information – much outside their area of expertise – isn’t productive.
In a series run by Advisory Board earlier this year, research showed that most of those in healthcare systems think their Board could deliver more value and expertise – but were too busy reviewing mountains of other information. A better approach can be to divide the tasks among Board members based on expertise. When the team can rely on one another to review information in their lanes of expertise, rather than all members attempting to take in all information, each person can focus and therefore contribute more.
At the same time, it is important to be vigilant in maintaining the line between management responsibilities and appropriate Board member oversight, and to ensure that the latter does not extend into intrusion around how to run the business. It is often not a bright yellow line – in fact, it can sometimes be quite fuzzy – but it is vital that this demarcation be thoughtfully respected. A pertinent example would be on Quality Committees where Board oversight of credentialing and safety is fully appropriate and desirable. However, when incidents occur that require consideration of disciplinary action, Board members must be vigilant not to be drawn into the conflicting roles of acting as both judge and jury.
Take Calculated Risks
Industry knowledge only gets you so far – today’s healthcare leaders must take risks to expand revenue in the face of declining margins and reimbursement rates. Many hospital systems have opened ambulatory surgery centers, imaging facilities, and other forms of outpatient care, but there are far more revenue options than ancillary care facilities.
The leadership and Board of health services organizations should consider what services they perform well that are valued highly by the industry as this overlap is ripe for commercialization. For example, today a quarter of hospital system spending typically goes to administrative costs, and healthcare leaders at facilities of all sizes are looking for ways to make that spend more efficient. Consider whether your system has a strength in back office administration or revenue cycle management, both processes smaller hospitals are often more than willing to outsource to larger systems with greater resources.
The potential for failure comes with the territory when you are trying new things and taking on new risks. Every new initiative will hit speed bumps, and some will inevitably fail. But that doesn’t necessarily reflect poorly on leadership. When things aren’t going as planned, or results are not coming as quickly as you would hope, preemptive communication with key internal and external constituents as well as the Board is one of the single most important things a healthcare leader can do. While these can be difficult conversations, early discussion and a culture of transparency ultimately allows for the most options and the greatest room to pivot. And pivoting, more than anything, is the key to success and leadership in an industry that is constantly changing, and in a business and regulatory environment where the unexpected happens regularly.
Visionary leadership is not just pursuing the bright idea. It is also figuring out how to do so within your financial, time and resource constraints. Management bandwidth is always an important concern today, and especially so when considering important projects that offer both significant opportunity as well as meaningful downside risk. That’s why each new venture should have a thorough Board review, certainly when it involves a commitment of financial resources in excess of a pre-agreed amount, and there should be an annual review of new risks that have been taken on or have emerged due to changing market conditions.
Whether its utilizing expertise or figuring out which risks to take, effective healthcare leadership requires close collaboration with many people. Administrators and Boards can be each other’s greatest allies or fiercest foes, and often the difference is the humility to understand how best to communicate and play to each other’s strengths.
Mark Claster is a Managing Partner at Carl Marks Advisors, a middle market investment bank and restructuring firm. Claster has over three decades of experience in restructuring, reorganization, and interim executive management. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.