Banner
  • Revenue Cycle Management
  • COVID-19
  • Reimbursement
  • Diabetes Awareness Month
  • Risk Management
  • Patient Retention
  • Staffing
  • Medical Economics® 100th Anniversary
  • Coding and documentation
  • Business of Endocrinology
  • Telehealth
  • Physicians Financial News
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cardiovascular Clinical Consult
  • Locum Tenens, brought to you by LocumLife®
  • Weight Management
  • Business of Women's Health
  • Practice Efficiency
  • Finance and Wealth
  • EHRs
  • Remote Patient Monitoring
  • Sponsored Webinars
  • Medical Technology
  • Billing and collections
  • Acute Pain Management
  • Exclusive Content
  • Value-based Care
  • Business of Pediatrics
  • Concierge Medicine 2.0 by Castle Connolly Private Health Partners
  • Practice Growth
  • Concierge Medicine
  • Business of Cardiology
  • Implementing the Topcon Ocular Telehealth Platform
  • Malpractice
  • Influenza
  • Sexual Health
  • Chronic Conditions
  • Technology
  • Legal and Policy
  • Money
  • Opinion
  • Vaccines
  • Practice Management
  • Patient Relations
  • Careers

The challenges medical practices will face in 2024 – and what to do about it

News
Article

A discussion about the risks practices are going to face in the coming year

Peter Reilly, HUB International: ©HUB International

Peter Reilly, HUB International: ©HUB International

Risk is always a part of practicing medicine, and the coming year will have no shortage of challenges practices must face in order to succeed. With this in mind, Medical Economics spoke with Peter Reilly, North American Healthcare Practice Leader, HUB International, an insurance and risk management expert.

Editor's note: The transcript has been edited for length and clarity.

Medical Economics: What are some of the challenges medical practices will face in 2024?

Peter Reilly: I think the practice of medicine continues to evolve and faces a number of challenges and opportunities at the same time. From reimbursements, and how that is going to impact the financial health of any given practice, that is always top of mind and needs to be considered. From a traditional risk-management and insurance standpoint, practices need to be mindful of the social inflation and other challenges that are impacting nearly all sorts of medical practices all the way through the largest health care institutions. And so they need to be having some candid and probably more frequent dialogue with trusted advisors to the medical practice, from insurance professionals like myself, to legal counsel, and accountants. They're all facing a real interplay of some of the wave of changes that are facing health care from how patients want to interact via virtual care, in-person care, are we potentially going to see some other pandemic or flu outbreak, or other type of infectious disease that is going to have everybody dusting off some of those disaster plans. I would be remiss if I didn't mention one of the big challenges is going to continue to be that with data security and privacy. Medical practices need to seek both legal and risk-management advice on how to handle those, because that's not going to go away.

Medical Economics: When looking at new revenue streams, what does a practice need to take into account before adding something new?

Reilly: That's a great question, because it's like some of the others, it's really multifaceted. Before just adding a new line of service or something like that, within a practice, or looking to invest in a related type of venture, something like a med spa, the first thing that physicians and medical practices really need to do is talk to an attorney about what they can do legally. The United States and even into parts of Canada are a real patchwork of legal and regulatory issues that need to be carefully considered. I have sadly seen a handful of times when that was not done. And what was seen as a new line of revenue and financial stability became a really illegal pothole, unfortunately. And so this is really a case of measure twice, cut once, when going down that path. But at the same time, and I don't know that 2024 is going to be the year for this. At least in the US, with the move to value-based care and downside risk contracts, those are complex financial arrangements that can be remarkably rewarding for the practices and other health care providers. I would encourage those who feel they can do that to explore those. Because if it's done well, and there are certain protections that can be created both again, legally and financially, from an insurance standpoint, that could be a real lifesaver for many medical practices. But the key is to talk to the advisors first, and really the first ones you need to speak to are the attorneys and have them look into this because those are binding contracts with CMS or other payers, and they're complicated and the devil is in the details. But if you're comfortable with that, I think that's probably going to be one of the biggest opportunities for new growth.

Medical Economics: With so many payers pushing more of the shared risk, value-based care models, what questions do practices need to be asking before they sign on the dotted line?

Reilly: Every one of those contracts is almost going to be a thing in and of itself. The medical practices need to be very mindful of exactly what are those metrics by which they are going to be measured, because the contract can be very detailed sometimes. I've seen organizations sort of gloss over exactly what are the expectations? What is the reimbursement amount going to be? And how and when, if there's a disagreement about that downside risk and the shared risk, is there any sort of appeal to where a middle ground can be found, because there may be different interpretations of the contract. So that's really number one in those types of arrangements. Taking nothing away from an intelligent group of individuals, but medical providers are not trained in this type of contractual arrangement; they should consult with experts. Really consider what the worst case scenario can be, and can they really afford the potential penalties that come with this. Everybody loves the upside, and that's an easier discussion, but taking a look at that downside, and what it would do, I call it a generational decision, because depending on the size of it, that can carry over across multiple fiscal years. Take the time to understand what that means. There are now insurance contracts and other protections that can be purchased to help with that additional shared risk of contract. Those should be explored and really looked at in a very careful and calculated economic model so that these practices and these providers can make an informed decision.

Medical Economics: Insurance costs can be a big expense for practices. What are some ways a practice can save money?

Reilly: It is always a challenge for medical practices when it comes to insurance, because in addition to the standard business insurance of protecting your property, your workers compensation, and those basic business insurance coverages -- employee benefits and the other things that go with retaining staff are important. But often, largely the single largest expense is that of medical professional liability. And that's a challenge in a marketplace that is seeing deteriorating results for that underwriting group. You will hear a lot of people say that it’s just marketing and going out for the lowest cost is one way to save money, and it is, but it's often short term and ineffective. There are really two things to be done before a decision is made about purchasing insurance. Number one, really know what your loss history looks like. And by that I mean it's not just a liability payment to a third party. Even if the allegations are completely bogus, you need to take into account third party liability payments, the defense costs that are incurred by the insurance company -- because they count those numbers -- and then any additional cost to you as a practice. Understanding that will give you any medical purchaser of MPL a better sense of where and how profitable they are. Because risk and insurance is like a market just like if you buy stocks, risk capital can be rented or purchased with an insurance contract. So knowing what your profile looks like is critically important at the outset. Don't just throw it to the market and expect that's going to do it for you. Secondly, take a hard look at your risk practices, your protocols, your checklist to make sure that your delivery of care is optimal, because that will if nothing else, if you do have some issues with losses, that is a way to mitigate those costs, because bad outcomes happen. No human body is the same and bad outcomes are not reflective necessarily of bad medicine. If you can demonstrate you've got good practices, good procedures, good protocols, all throughout your practice, that is meaningfully different than just getting quotes in the marketplace. It's also the way to save money over the long haul, like five to 10-year periods, because better practicing clinics and practitioners almost always have better outcomes, both clinically and from an insurance standpoint. You can always look at raising deductibles and things like that which may be meaningful. But in this marketplace, the best way to do it is to take the time to understand the numbers and the data, and then what you can reasonably expect to do and take the time to meet with some underwriters because every now and again you'll click with an underwriter and that underwriter is going to want to do business with the medical practice for as long as they can.

Medical Economics: Staffing shortages are often a major problem identified by medical practices as hindering their growth. How should practices approach this problem?

Reilly: I think this is probably one of a handful of generational issues. that practices are facing. Retaining staff is critical and attracting new staff has become an equally as important because burnout happens and continues to happen. I think it's really a three-fold answer to how you do that, and depending on where you're located, this may be easier than others. But if as a medical practice you haven't aligned yourself with some local, either medical schools or other pipelines for talent, be that your nursing programs are sending up internships, all the way through to the administrative staff, I would encourage that. Maybe it's only one or two people a year that come through with something like that, but that's where you're going to find folks who will either like what you're doing, or equally as important, find those who are probably not a good fit so you don't have a recurring turnover problem. That's not been something that is germane to medical practices traditionally, but that's one where a number of these schools, particularly in light of that very unfortunate nursing licensing challenge that went on earlier this year, it's important to vet these people early. Number two, the employee experience, how they feel about things beyond just their work, have become something that medical practices and the health care industry as a whole really needs to begin to embrace more consistently. It's not just about having nice medical benefits or paying for them in a particular way. What I as a 55-plus individual values in my employee experience is going to vary a great deal from someone who's 25. What is important to them may be pet insurance or access to a couple of extra days of personal time, having that flexibility to really tailor to that employee experience is more and more important for practices, no matter the size, to retain those folks. And then lastly, and this is taught in almost every business school, or certainly within every HR department, it does matter to listen to what your staff and employees say, listen to your partners. And if there are serious issues, trying to do things to correct them are important. Often, it is perception. When staff don't hear from the medical leadership in any particular clinic or facility, rumors start, and particularly in health care, the burnout and the difficulty of irrational patients is challenging. I was in medical office recently where someone showed up almost 90 minutes early for their appointment and they demanded to be seen now. It was disruptive and they were loud. This wasn't from waiting, they were there early. And the poor staff had an incredibly difficult time dealing with this. When it was over, one of the doctors came out and literally gave this person a hug and you could see the tension melt away. That human characteristic of medicine, which is still such a human trait in business, matters. I know that sounds like sort of soft advice, but it does matter. That employee experience is becoming more and more important.

Medical Economics: With so many challenges in the coming year, what specific risks do practices need to consider? And how can they reduce their exposure?

Reilly: The easy one that I think we see too many medical providers still try to avoid is that of data security. We, in the insurance industry and risk management, tend to talk about it as cyber liability insurance. Even if you're just reading a patient record that was sent to you by a hospital or something, if you touch it and you return it, you offer an opinion on it, it's your record, no matter what you tell yourself. But that particular issue around data security is one that I think too many practices still do not take seriously enough. They don't buy adequate protection, and they don't avail themselves to the resources that are there. Have a good counsel review your contracts with your cloud-based provider of your information or what you're doing with it.

There are also employment practices, Allegations of “Oh, I was let go,” or “I wasn't hired” or there was some sort of harassment -- those types of issues remain in a what I'll call a distressed work environment. And by that I mean health care is stressful. People talk about being in the post-COVID world, but I'm not convinced we're there yet in terms of how people treat medicine. People are questioning the legitimacy of the science behind medicine. Well, that doubt has crept in a lot of places. Having that risk addressed, and again, insurance is one tool to deal with it, should be explored. There's always the granddaddy of them all -- medical professional liability. Having a review, not just of your insurance policies, but of your protocols and your procedures, at least once a year, if not twice, is what is going to carry the day. Because as I alluded to a little earlier, the medical professional liability insurance world is still losing money on insurance premiums. And they're going to want to deploy their capital and give the best pricing to the most cost-effective programs, to those practices that do engage in even a modicum of risk management. That is, unfortunately, a very broad topic. Partner with people who can help explain it to you, and prioritize what is important for your particular practice, and it's very different if you're practicing in Los Angeles, Orange County, or Cook County, Illinois, or now even parts of Georgia, which has become a very challenging litigation spot, versus practicing in Wyoming, or even, parts of Virginia. The time it takes to do that, and I know takes away from the practice of medicine, but that is the single best thing that medical practices can do. And I think lastly, working with competent insurance brokers, counsel, advisors, those who really understand health care, is going to become more and more critical. Having your lawyer be the person you went to high school with whose lives down the street may or may not be the best person to avail yourself of for that type of need. Working with professionals who specialize in this space matters. Education, and knowing what's going on in the marketplace is critical for practices, because it is dynamic, it is changing, and if and when value-based care truly goes fully live, that's going to be a seismic change to how health care financing will work. It all adds more to the plate of practitioners and I know that's tough, but the practice of medicine is only going to be more complicated, not less so, for the foreseeable future.

Related Videos
Jennifer N. Lee, MD, FAAFP
© National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
© National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
© National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
© National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
© National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
© National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health