- Revenue Cycle Management
- COVID-19
- Reimbursement
- Diabetes Awareness Month
- Risk Management
- Patient Retention
- Staffing
- Medical Economics® 100th Anniversary
- Coding and documentation
- Business of Endocrinology
- Telehealth
- Physicians Financial News
- Cybersecurity
- Cardiovascular Clinical Consult
- Locum Tenens, brought to you by LocumLife®
- Weight Management
- Business of Women's Health
- Practice Efficiency
- Finance and Wealth
- EHRs
- Remote Patient Monitoring
- Sponsored Webinars
- Medical Technology
- Billing and collections
- Acute Pain Management
- Exclusive Content
- Value-based Care
- Business of Pediatrics
- Concierge Medicine 2.0 by Castle Connolly Private Health Partners
- Practice Growth
- Concierge Medicine
- Business of Cardiology
- Implementing the Topcon Ocular Telehealth Platform
- Malpractice
- Influenza
- Sexual Health
- Chronic Conditions
- Technology
- Legal and Policy
- Money
- Opinion
- Vaccines
- Practice Management
- Patient Relations
- Careers
State pre-emption
I've been told that laws in my state that are less strict than the federal privacy rule are pre-empted by it. Is this right?
Q:I've been told that laws in my state that are less strict than the federal privacy rule are pre-empted by it. Is this right?
A: Yes. Generally speaking, HIPAA sets a minimum privacy standard for all states. Where this standard exceeds the standard set by the state, you must obey HIPAA. If, on the other hand, your state requires more than the minimum standard set by HIPAA, you're required to obey both your state law and the federal privacy rule. For instance, let's say your state requires that requests for release of HIV information contain very specific and highly protective language relating to safeguards, patient confidentiality, and the like. In such cases, authorizations for release of information must contain the precise state language, as well as the less restrictive federal language.
