Banner

Article

Record requests

I have a patient who was involved in an automobile accident about three years ago. I never treated her, and, in my records, the only mention of the accident and her subsequent ankle surgery is when she returned nearly a year later for her BP/hyperlipidemia checkup. Despite this, I've received a HIPAA-authorized release from my patient's lawyer, requesting that I send over her medical records from the date of the accident to the present. Must I comply, even though I didn't treat the patient for anything pertaining to the accident itself?

Q: I have a patient who was involved in an automobile accident about three years ago. I never treated her, and, in my records, the only mention of the accident and her subsequent ankle surgery is when she returned nearly a year later for her BP/hyperlipidemia checkup. Despite this, I've received a HIPAA-authorized release from my patient's lawyer, requesting that I send over her medical records from the date of the accident to the present. Must I comply, even though I didn't treat the patient for anything pertaining to the accident itself?

A: Yes. Your patient has the right to access any part of her entire medical record, including those parts that don't pertain directly to her accident, but which could be important to a court or some other entity trying to reach a proper decision. For this reason, as long as the attorney's request has been authorized by your patient-which appears to be the case-you must release all records for the specified time period in your possession.

Related Videos
ACP policy update 2025: A conversation with Brian E. Outland, PhD
ACP policy update 2025 interview
ACP policy update 2025 interview
ACP policy update 2025 interview
ACP policy update 2025 interview
ACP policy update 2025 interview
ACP policy update 2025 interview