• Revenue Cycle Management
  • COVID-19
  • Reimbursement
  • Diabetes Awareness Month
  • Risk Management
  • Patient Retention
  • Staffing
  • Medical Economics® 100th Anniversary
  • Coding and documentation
  • Business of Endocrinology
  • Telehealth
  • Physicians Financial News
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cardiovascular Clinical Consult
  • Locum Tenens, brought to you by LocumLife®
  • Weight Management
  • Business of Women's Health
  • Practice Efficiency
  • Finance and Wealth
  • EHRs
  • Remote Patient Monitoring
  • Sponsored Webinars
  • Medical Technology
  • Billing and collections
  • Acute Pain Management
  • Exclusive Content
  • Value-based Care
  • Business of Pediatrics
  • Concierge Medicine 2.0 by Castle Connolly Private Health Partners
  • Practice Growth
  • Concierge Medicine
  • Business of Cardiology
  • Implementing the Topcon Ocular Telehealth Platform
  • Malpractice
  • Influenza
  • Sexual Health
  • Chronic Conditions
  • Technology
  • Legal and Policy
  • Money
  • Opinion
  • Vaccines
  • Practice Management
  • Patient Relations
  • Careers

Physicians' Earnings: Our exclusive survey

Article

As demand for primary care doctors plateaus, so does income.

 

COVER STORY

Physicians' Earnings
Our Exclusive Survey

Jump to:
Choose article section...How much did you earn last year?

As demand for primary care doctors plateaus, so does income.

By Wayne J. Guglielmo
Senior Editor

Markets typically reward scarcity, so it shouldn't be surprising that some of the nation's most sought after specialists are significantly ahead in the earnings race. Among the selected specialties we looked at for 2002, median total compensation was highest for invasive cardiologists—$360,000.

The numbers come from the latest Medical Economics Continuing Survey, which sampled MDs and DOs in office-based private practice. Invasive cardiologists were followed, in order, by gastroenterologists, orthopedic surgeons, noninvasive cardiologists, and general surgeons.

The picture was different in primary care, where there's a "rough equivalency between supply and demand," according to Merritt, Hawkins & Associates, a physician search and consulting firm in Irving, TX. It reports that "income offers made to primary care physicians remained relatively flat," although generalists were still in demand in certain places, especially rural areas.

Among the primary care specialists we surveyed, ob/gyns led their colleagues with the highest practice revenue and also the highest total compensation ($500,000 and $220,000, respectively). Internists are on par with FPs with total compensation of $150,000. Pediatricians and GPs trailed behind with total compensation of $130,000 and $116,000, respectively.

A change in statistical methodology prevents a comparison with previous years. Nevertheless, several trends emerged.

For instance, it's good to go group; and if you do, look for a big, single-specialty group: Surveyed physicians in groups of 10 to 24 had the highest practice revenue ($700,000) and total compensation ($300,000). We also found that physicians in single-specialty groups received 16 percent (or $30,000) more in total compensation than their colleagues in multispecialty groups.

As might be expected, physicians—whether in primary care or specialty practice—hit their earnings peak between the ages of 50 and 54. Earnings start to dwindle as retirement closes in, probably because they tend to taper their practices.

Physicians in the South had the highest total compensation, typically earning $30,000 more than their colleagues in the East, where total compensation was lowest last year.

And the gender gap persists. The typical female physician received $55,000 less in total compensation than her male counterpart. One of the reasons typically posited for that fact is that women are more likely to choose the lower paying specialties; they also tend to work fewer hours than their male colleagues. Among FPs, internists, and pediatricians, the gap is narrowest in family medicine, where male physicians earned only $10,000 more than female doctors.

Where do you fit in? The accompanying charts and tables will help you do a comparative analysis by specialty, age, geographic region, gender, and other variables.

 

How much did you earn last year?1

Primary care physicians
2002 practice revenue
2002 total compensation
Ob/gyns
$500,000
$220,000
FPs
350,000
150,000
Internists
318,600
150,000
Pediatricians
350,000
130,000
GPs
249,000
116,000
Cardiologists (invasive)
$780,000
$360,000
Gastroenterologists
550,000
300,000
Orthopedic surgeons
700,000
300,000
Cardiologists (noninvasive)
500,000
250,000
General surgeons
407,000
230,000
All respondents
390,000
162,000

 

How earnings varied in 2002

Practice revenue
Total compensation
Solo
$350,000
$160,000
Expense-sharing
386,200
184,000
2 physicians
403,300
156,700
3 physicians
407,000
190,000
4 physicians
533,600
182,500
5-9 physicians
477,300
208,000
10-24 physicians
700,000
300,000
25-49 physicians
—
—
50 or more physicians
—
198,000
Single-specialty groups
500,000
220,000
Multispecialty groups
402,000
190,000
1-5
$322,400
$136,000
6-10
400,000
160,000
11-20
420,000
170,800
21-30
389,500
174,000
Over 30
334,000
153,300
By physician's age
 
 
30-34
$330,000
$130,000
35-39
350,000
160,000
40-44
420,000
179,000
45-49
440,000
168,000
50-54
408,700
198,000
55-59
339,000
174,000
60-64
310,000
150,000
65-69
260,000
150,000

 

A big gender gap

 
Practice revenue
Total compensation
Male
$407,000
$180,000
Female
300,000
125,000

 

Where do you stand in the earnings race?

Total compensation
Cardiologists (invasive)
Cardiologists (noninvasive)
FPs
Gastroenterologists
General surgeons
$400,000 or more
46%
20%
3%
29%
10%
350,000 - 399,999
10
3
1
8
8
300,000 - 349,999
16
13
1
14
11
250,000 - 299,999
9
21
4
15
14
200,000 - 249,999
9
16
16
18
23
150,000 - 199,999
10
13
29
9
7
125,000 - 149,999
1
2
18
4
4
100,000 - 124,999
<1
5
13
2
15
80,000 - 99,999
<1
1
7
1
2
60,000 - 79,999
<1
2
3
<1
2
Less than $60,000
<1
5
4
1
5
Total compensation
GPs
Internists
Ob/gyns
Orthopedic surgeons
Pediatricians
All respondents
$400,000 or more
<1%
4%
10%
33%
3%
9%
350,000 - 399,999
<1
1
5
10
<1
3
300,000 - 349,999
2
3
12
14
4
6
250,000 - 299,999
3
7
14
14
3
8
200,000 - 249,999
12
11
17
13
9
14
150,000 - 199,999
17
27
20
11
21
22
125,000 - 149,999
10
15
7
1
15
12
100,000 - 124,999
17
20
10
1
23
15
80,000 - 99,999
8
5
1
1
12
5
60,000 - 79,999
13
6
3
<1
7
4
Less than $60,000
17
2
1
2
5
3

 

Physicians in the South earn the most

 
Practice revenue
Total compensation
EAST
$350,000
$150,000
New England
312,000
140,000
Mid-East
350,000
150,000
MIDWEST
$389,300
$161,000
Great Lakes region
400,000
175,000
Plains states
375,000
160,000
SOUTH
$405,000
$180,000
South Atlantic
400,000
170,000
Mid-South
375,000
190,900
Southwest
451,100
200,000
WEST
$387,500
$160,000
Rocky Mountain region
391,000
170,000
Far West (including Alaska and Hawaii)
386,700
158,900

 

A closer look at total compensation
in primary care

By physician’s age . . .
Under 45
45 and over
FPs
$150,000
$150,000
GPs
—
120,000
Internists
150,000
150,000
Ob/gyns
212,700
225,000
Pediatricians
120,000
150,000
By years in practice . . .
1-10
11 and over
FPs
$138,000
$150,000
GPs
—
120,000
Internists
140,000
152,000
Ob/gyns
—
225,000
Pediatricians
125,000
130,000
By gender
Male
Female
FPs
$150,000
$140,000
GPs
115,000
—
Internists
155,000
120,000
Ob/gyns
223,000
—
Pediatricians
150,000
120,000

 

How this year's survey was conducted

Questionnaires for this year's Medical Economics Continuing Survey, developed and fielded under the direction of Sandy Johnson, manager of field services, were mailed in mid-March to 24,335 MDs and DOs in private, office-based practice throughout the US. This represents a random sampling of nine selected specialties from the AMA master list maintained by Access Worldwide-the Phoenix Marketing Group. A follow-up mailing to nonrespondents took place in late April.

By the late-May cutoff date, 3,089 MDs and DOs had responded. After we set aside returns with apparent discrepancies and those from physicians who hadn't been providing office-based patient care throughout 2002, our working sample consisted of 1,994 physicians. These were coded by the Medical Economics research staff and then tabulated by computer by Suzanne Coopersmith of Crosstabs in Syosset, NY.

The survey sample was selected to be representative within each specialty as to type of practice, age, geographical region, and gender. The results were weighted to reflect these criteria.

 

Wayne Guglielmo. Physicians' Earnings: Our exclusive survey. Medical Economics Sep. 19, 2003;80:71.

Related Videos