Banner
  • Revenue Cycle Management
  • COVID-19
  • Reimbursement
  • Diabetes Awareness Month
  • Risk Management
  • Patient Retention
  • Staffing
  • Medical Economics® 100th Anniversary
  • Coding and documentation
  • Business of Endocrinology
  • Telehealth
  • Physicians Financial News
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cardiovascular Clinical Consult
  • Locum Tenens, brought to you by LocumLife®
  • Weight Management
  • Business of Women's Health
  • Practice Efficiency
  • Finance and Wealth
  • EHRs
  • Remote Patient Monitoring
  • Sponsored Webinars
  • Medical Technology
  • Billing and collections
  • Acute Pain Management
  • Exclusive Content
  • Value-based Care
  • Business of Pediatrics
  • Concierge Medicine 2.0 by Castle Connolly Private Health Partners
  • Practice Growth
  • Concierge Medicine
  • Business of Cardiology
  • Implementing the Topcon Ocular Telehealth Platform
  • Malpractice
  • Influenza
  • Sexual Health
  • Chronic Conditions
  • Technology
  • Legal and Policy
  • Money
  • Opinion
  • Vaccines
  • Practice Management
  • Patient Relations
  • Careers

ONLINE News Briefs

Article

Mutual Funds, Charity

 

ONLINE News Briefs

Mutual Funds: You don’t always get what you pay for

Many funds with high costs are turning in low performances, according to a recent study by Standard & Poor’s. The study examined mutual funds with high management fees and operating expenses and found that on average they performed poorly from 1999 through November 2001.

The 24 funds with expense ratios of 2.99 percent of assets or higher earned only one or two (out of five) stars from Standard & Poor’s. The best fund in the group, Pacific Advisors Small Cap Fund-Class C, returned an average of 3 percent a year to investors; the worst, American Heritage, lost an average of 39 percent a year. By comparison, the average stock mutual fund carries an expense ratio of 1.50 percent and returned an average of 3.63 percent each year for the three years studied, according to Morningstar.

Charity: Love to give, hate to choose?

Nearly nine of 10 households made a charitable contribution in 2000, averaging $1,620 per family, says the Independent Sector, a coalition of philanthropy programs. Some forty-four percent of adults volunteered their time for charity, while 42 percent gave both money and time.

While most people are generous, it’s easy to get confused when 1.4 million nonprofit organizations are vying for your checkbook, says the American Institute of Philanthropy. To figure out which one deserves your money, get as much information as you can. Request literature, including the charity’s annual report, before you contribute. Ask to see a copy of the group’s Form 990, the financial document that most charities are required to file with the Internal Revenue Service. Check to see how much of your contribution will actually go to the charitable program and how much will be used for administration or fundraising. For a list of charities that willingly share financial information and spend no more than 25 percent of contributions on administration or fundraising, go to the AIP’s Web site, www.charitywatch.org .

 



Joan Rose. ONLINE News Briefs.

Medical Economics

2002;4.

Related Videos