Financial model shows costs, savings from HIE
Being able to access your patients' health data immediately is good for their health. Now you can find out whether it can help your bottom line.
Have you ever wondered whether participating in an electronic
A team of researchers at the University of Wisconsin–Madison has developed a financial model that enables payers and providers to quantify the financial worth of participating in an HIE. The model can be used for any of the three most common ways of funding an exchange: a fixed annual fee for each participant, a charge for each patient visit to a provider institution, or a charge for each look-up of information. The researchers describe their model in a paper published in the
“We wanted to provide a very generalized methodology that aggregates a variety of datasets and can be applied anywhere,” lead researcher
The research team applied their model using data from 4,639 visits to three large emergency departments (EDs) in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, over a year. They obtained data from Medicare and Medicaid claims, public reports of hospital admissions, published payer mix data, and use data from the
The study found that, in this case, access to the data provided through HIE would have resulted in financial gains for providers and payers. For payers, the gains would have been due to a decrease in reimbursements brought about by reductions in hospitalizations and ED visits. Providers would have realized savings from a reduced need for tests on, and hospital admissions of, Medicare and Medicaid patients.
Overall, about 70% of the savings to participants would have been the result of fewer unrequired hospitalizations-which the investigators define as “those that occur because there is insufficient information available in the ED to make a diagnosis and disposition”-and fewer repeat ED visits. The remaining 30% of the savings would have resulted from a reduction of duplicated tests and imaging studies.
The model demonstrates that hospitals and EDs that treat large numbers of
“HMO contracts with hospitals and EDs usually are capitated, so there’s an incentive for the institution to perform as few procedures as possible to attain the same level of care,” he says. “By seeing what has been done for the patient already, HIE enables the institution to avoid wasting money by duplicating tests and procedures that have already been performed.”
Depending on a provider’s patient mix, HIE participation could in theory be revenue-neutral or even unprofitable, but the necessary combination of circumstances is unlikely to occur, Sridhar says.
Related Content
Newsletter
Stay informed and empowered with Medical Economics enewsletter, delivering expert insights, financial strategies, practice management tips and technology trends — tailored for today’s physicians.
