• Revenue Cycle Management
  • COVID-19
  • Reimbursement
  • Diabetes Awareness Month
  • Risk Management
  • Patient Retention
  • Staffing
  • Medical Economics® 100th Anniversary
  • Coding and documentation
  • Business of Endocrinology
  • Telehealth
  • Physicians Financial News
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cardiovascular Clinical Consult
  • Locum Tenens, brought to you by LocumLife®
  • Weight Management
  • Business of Women's Health
  • Practice Efficiency
  • Finance and Wealth
  • EHRs
  • Remote Patient Monitoring
  • Sponsored Webinars
  • Medical Technology
  • Billing and collections
  • Acute Pain Management
  • Exclusive Content
  • Value-based Care
  • Business of Pediatrics
  • Concierge Medicine 2.0 by Castle Connolly Private Health Partners
  • Practice Growth
  • Concierge Medicine
  • Business of Cardiology
  • Implementing the Topcon Ocular Telehealth Platform
  • Malpractice
  • Influenza
  • Sexual Health
  • Chronic Conditions
  • Technology
  • Legal and Policy
  • Money
  • Opinion
  • Vaccines
  • Practice Management
  • Patient Relations
  • Careers

Electronic health information exchange is coming-but slowly

Article

Solutions to the challenge of exchanging patient health data between different electronic health record systems are beginning to emerge.

One of the goals of the federal electronic health records (EHR) incentive program-also known as Meaningful Use (MU)-has been to make it possible to quickly and easily exchange clinical information in electronic form between providers in separate locations using different EHR systems.

Stage 1 of MU was focused mainly on getting physicians off of paper charts and onto an EHR, whereas Stage 2, which starts in 2014, puts more emphasis on information sharing between care settings. In fact, health information exchange is among the requirements doctors must meet to qualify for MU2 financial incentives.

EHR vendors challenged

Information exchange, or interoperability, poses a significant challenge for EHR vendors, because until now EHRs have not been designed to communicate with one another-and in fact have little financial incentive to do so.

Fortunately, other solutions to the interoperability problem are starting to materialize. Among these is the development of a standardized structure for the continuity of care documents (CCDs) and continuity of care records (CCRs) generated by EHRs, as well as secure protocols for transmitting them between providers,  because EHRs must be able to export and receive data from these files to receive MU2 certification.

Exchange networks growing

Even more important is the growth of health information exchange networks that provide a set of common standards to their members for sending and receiving data electronically.  These are being created by private hospitals and integrated health systems, as well as by states and other public entities. The federal Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology has provided funding for 56 public entities.

In addition, six major EHR vendors recently announced plans to form their own consortium, the CommonWell Health Alliance, with the goal of promoting and certifying a national infrastructure with common standards and policies for health information exchange.

The Direct Project

The Direct Project, a consortium of EHR vendors, medical organizations, government agencies, and consultants, is yet another emerging method for transmitting messages securely and in standardized formats between different EHR systems. Direct Project protocols are expected to be part of MU2-certified EHR systems beginning in 2014.

Independent practitioners may find accessing interoperability technologies more challenging, at least at first. Regional extension centers,  state and local medical societies, and local hospitals are potential sources for  information about health information exchanges.  The exchange itself will provide information about service agreements, costs, and privacy and interoperability standards.

Our healthcare system and technology infrastructure has a long way to go before we can send patient data quickly, reliably, and securely between providers in different locations who use different EHR systems. The good news is that we have made considerable progress towards reaching that goal recently, and I feel confident that we will attain it in the next few years.

The author is a healthcare information technology consultant in Hayward, California, and author of the blog RobertRowleyMD.com. Send your health information technology questions to medec@advanstar.com.

 

Related Videos
Kyle Zebley headshot
Kyle Zebley headshot
Kyle Zebley headshot
Michael J. Barry, MD
Hadi Chaudhry, President and CEO, CareCloud
Claire Ernst, JD, gives expert advice
Arien Malec